Skip to main content
← All vulnerabilities
CVE-2026-119420EUVD-2026-113800GHSA-GVQV-G6VJ-P22G

Lago through 1.55.0 Authentication Bypass via acceptInvite GraphQL Mutation

Lago through 1.55.0 is affected when the invited email already has a Lago account. CVSS rates it 8.7 (high). No fix is listed in the checked facts.

Published
Last modified
published
Not listed in CISA KEV
Specific setups only
Fix
Fix or patch referenced
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub

Summary

Lago, an open-source billing platform, contains an authentication bypass that lets organization administrators take over existing user accounts without knowing their passwords. An attacker could use this to access the victim's organizations, billing data, API keys, and payment integrations.

Summarized by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5. Verify details against the original sources.

Read the original description

Lago through 1.55.0 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows organization administrators to obtain session tokens for existing accounts via the acceptInvite mutation without a password check. Attackers can invite a victim's email, accept with an arbitrary password, and receive a JWT to access the victim's organizations, billing data, API keys and payment integrations.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now

Affected versions

  • getlago lago

    through 1.55.0

References 7

GitHub · getlago/lago-api

abraxaslabs.tech

vulncheck.com

FAQ

Questions about CVE-2026-119420

What does this mean?

Accepting an invitation with the wrong password can add a membership and issue a JWT for an existing user's account. This lets the invite flow grant access without the correct password.Source: github.com

Am I affected, and how do I check?

Lago through version 1.55.0 is affected, and the bug needs the invited email to already have a Lago account. To check a Lago install, look up its version number and whether the invite targets an existing account.Source: github.com

What should I do about it?

The checked facts name no fixed version. Check the vendor's releases for a version newer than 1.55.0 and install it when available.Source: github.com

Is it being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data