Skip to main content
← Vulnerabilities

Uninitialized output buffer returned after nd_to_text failure in pybddisasm

Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.

6.9MediumCNA
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
No fix listed
Who is exposed
Not reported
22Pcve.now Index 22 of 100 · methodology v3 · provisional
  • Exploitation0/40No signal
  • Exposure?/25Exposure: unknown (data gap). No advisory context yet
  • Reach10/20Affects PyPI packages
  • Severity6.9/10CVSS 6.9
  • No patch5/5No patch listed yet

What would change the score

  • Would score about 77 if added to CISA KEV
  • Would score about 72 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
  • Would score about 44 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed

CVE-2026-118448 is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. No public exploit code is tracked. It is rated CVSS 6.9 (medium) and affects pybddisasm; no fixed version is listed yet.

Published
Last modified
Published
Not listed in CISA KEV
0.10% · 1st percentile
22/100 · provisional
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
  • Exploitation: none
  • Automatable: no
  • Technical impact: partial

Summary

The pybddisasm Python bindings for the bddisasm x86 disassembler are affected, specifically their nd_to_text function. When text conversion fails, the returned output may contain uninitialized memory, which could leak leftover data from the process or crash the Python program.

Read the original description

A use of uninitialized memory vulnerability in the pybddisasm Python bindings affects nd_to_text. If the underlying text conversion fails, including failures caused by invalid parameters, the output buffer may remain uninitialized while still being converted into a Python return value. This may disclose residual process memory or cause the Python process to crash. Exploitation requires an application to invoke nd_to_text in a way that causes conversion to fail and to return or otherwise use the resulting output. The pybddisasm package is no longer maintained.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now
  3. CISA SSVC assessment

    Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial

  4. Record last updated

Affected versions

  • pybddisasmPyPI

    through 0.3.0

Evidence 1

  1. Link

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

FAQ

Questions about CVE-2026-118448

Is CVE-2026-118448 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-118448?

pybddisasm (PyPI): through 0.3.0.Source: cve.now feed data