Skip to main content
← Vulnerabilities

Out-of-bounds read vulnerability in GitHub Enterprise Server allowed disclosure of process memory in the Git service

Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.

5.3MediumCNA
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
Fixed in 3.19.14, 3.20.10, 3.21.8, 3.22.3
Who is exposed
Not reported

Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 3.19.14, 3.20.10, 3.21.8, 3.22.3.

8Pcve.now Index 8 of 100 · methodology v3 · provisional
  • Exploitation?/40Exploitation: unknown (data gap). No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
  • Exposure3/25Reachable over the network · Data gap: No advisory context yet
  • Reach?/20Reach: unknown (data gap). No tracked technology or package matched
  • Severity5.3/10CVSS 5.3
  • No patch0/5No signal

What would change the score

  • Would score about 63 if added to CISA KEV
  • Would score about 58 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
  • Would score about 27 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed

CVE-2026-118237 is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. No public exploit code is tracked. It is rated CVSS 5.3 (medium) and affects Enterprise Server; fixed in 3.19.14, 3.20.10, 3.21.8 and 1 more.

Published
Last modified
Published
Not listed in CISA KEV
8/100 · provisional
Fix
Fixed in 3.19.14, 3.20.10, 3.21.8, 3.22.3
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub

Summary

GitHub Enterprise Server's Git service (babeld) is affected by this vulnerability, which lets an authenticated user with SSH access read a limited amount of the server's process memory. The impact is that sensitive data held in that memory could be exposed to the attacker.

Read the original description

An out-of-bounds read vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server in the Git service (babeld). When proving possession of a host key, babeld's SSH implementation sized the session identifier by the current digest length rather than its own. An attacker with an account and SSH access could re-key to an algorithm with a longer hash, causing adjacent process memory to be signed and returned to the client, where a limited amount of it may be recoverable. This vulnerability affected all releases prior to 3.23 and was fixed in versions 3.22.3, 3.21.8, 3.20.10, and 3.19.14. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.

What to do

  • Upgrade to a fixed version: 3.19.14, 3.20.10, 3.21.8, 3.22.3.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now

Affected versions

  • GitHub Enterprise Server

    From 3.19.0 · fixed in 3.19.14; From 3.20.0 · fixed in 3.20.10; From 3.21.0 · fixed in 3.21.8; From 3.22.0 · fixed in 3.22.3

Evidence 4

  1. Link
  2. Link
  3. Link
  4. Link

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

FAQ

Questions about CVE-2026-118237

Is CVE-2026-118237 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-118237?

Enterprise Server: from 3.19.0 before 3.19.14; from 3.20.0 before 3.20.10; from 3.21.0 before 3.21.8; from 3.22.0 before 3.22.3.Source: cve.now feed data

How do I fix CVE-2026-118237?

Upgrade to a fixed version: 3.19.14, 3.20.10, 3.21.8, 3.22.3.Source: cve.now feed data