Skip to main content
← Vulnerabilities

FreeSWITCH: Out-of-bounds read in RTCP NACK feedback parsing

Affects FreeSWITCH deployments that terminate video calls with RTCP active on the video stream. Fixed in 1.11.2.

Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.

7.5HighCNA
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
Fixed in 1.11.2
Who is exposed
Default setups

Do first: Check every install: default setups are affected.

Published
Last modified
33/100 · provisional
Default setups
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
  • Exploitation: none
  • Automatable: yes
  • Technical impact: partial

Summary

FreeSWITCH, a software telecom switching stack, is affected by an out-of-bounds read flaw in its RTCP NACK feedback parsing. A remote attacker on the network, without logging in, can send crafted RTCP packets to an active video call and crash FreeSWITCH, ending every active call.

Read the original description

FreeSWITCH is a Software Defined Telecom Stack enabling the digital transformation from proprietary telecom switches to a software implementation that runs on any commodity hardware. Prior to 1.11.2, process_rtcp_report() used an RTPFB NACK packet's declared RTCP header length as its feedback-entry loop bound instead of the datagram length already validated by the caller. A short packet with an oversized declaration could drive reads far beyond the fixed 16 KiB receive buffer. Any peer able to send RTCP to an active video call can reach the flaw, including calls where remote SDP enables video RTCP even though the SIP profile has no explicit RTCP interval configured. The out-of-bounds read can crash FreeSWITCH and terminate every active call, but supplies no write primitive and does not echo the read values to the sender. This issue is fixed in version 1.11.2.

cve.now Index

33Pcve.now Index 33 of 100 · methodology v3 · provisional
  • Exploitation0/40No signal
  • Exposure25/25Default setups, CISA rates it automatable
  • Reach?/20Unknown. No tracked technology or package matched
  • Severity7.5/10CVSS 7.5
  • No patch0/5No signal

What would change the score

  • Would score about 73 if added to CISA KEV
  • Would score about 68 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active

What to do

  • Check every install: default setups are affected.

  • Upgrade to a fixed version: 1.11.2.

  • Workaround: Restricting the media port range at the firewall to known media peers reduces exposure

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now
  3. CISA SSVC assessment

    Exploitation: none · Automatable: yes · Technical impact: partial

  4. Record last updated

Affected versions

  • signalwire freeswitch

    fixed in 1.11.2

Evidence 3

  1. Advisory
  2. Repository
  3. Repository

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

Questions about CVE-2026-116784

Is CVE-2026-116784 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data

What does this mean?

The bug is an out-of-bounds read in the parsing of RTCP NACK feedback. Reading past the RTCP buffer crashes the FreeSWITCH process, which terminates every call the instance is handling.Source: github.com, github.com

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-116784?

freeswitch: before 1.11.2.Source: cve.now feed data

Am I affected, and how do I check?

Affected are FreeSWITCH deployments that terminate video calls with RTCP active on the video stream. RTCP can be enabled for a call by an a=rtcp-fb or a=rtcp attribute in the remote SDP, even without RTCP interval settings in the SIP profile. Check the installed FreeSWITCH version and whether video calls in the deployment run with RTCP active.Source: github.com, github.com

How do I fix CVE-2026-116784?

Upgrade FreeSWITCH to 1.11.2 or later, which contains the fix that bounds the RTCP NACK feedback loop to the validated length.Source: github.com, github.com