ingress-nginx mirror-target self-DOS
- Exploited
- No known exploitation
- Fix
- Fixed in 1.15.2-prime1
- Who is exposed
- Not reported
Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 1.15.2-prime1.
- Last modified
- A 0-100 score for how much a CVE matters across the industry: exploitation, exposure, how widely the software is used, severity and whether a fix exists.What do these mean? →
- 23/100 · provisional
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
Summary
A user with high privileges in a cluster, specifically permission to create Ingress objects, can remotely reach ingress-nginx's unauthenticated configuration API through the mirror-target annotation and corrupt its data. This causes ingress-nginx to drop all traffic it handles until an Ingress configuration change or a controller restart rebuilds the data.
Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.
Read the original description
A security issue was discovered in ingress-nginx where a user with permission to create an Ingress may be able to cause denial of service of the ingress-nginx data plane, or possibly redirect traffic from other Ingresses. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if they are using ingress-nginx.
Due to a missing check, the mirror-target Ingress annotation can be used to target an unauthenticated configuration API within the ingress-nginx controller, allowing write commands to be submitted. Corrupting the data within that configuration API results in all traffic through ingress-nginx being dropped until an Ingress configuration change or a controller restart causes the data to be recreated correctly.
In principle, this write access could also be used to redirect traffic from other Ingresses controlled by the same ingress-nginx instance. In practice, there is negligible additional risk: such redirection would require privileged information about internal ingress-nginx state, and users can already redirect traffic from other Ingresses controlled by the same ingress-nginx anyway.
cve.now Index
- Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
- Exposure3/25Reachable over the network · Unknown: No advisory context yet
- Reach17/20Affects Kubernetes (a widely deployed server, runtime, framework or database)
- Severity2.7/10CVSS 2.7
- No patch0/5No signal
What would change the score
- Would score about 78 if added to CISA KEV
- Would score about 73 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
- Would score about 42 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed
What to do
Upgrade to a fixed version: 1.15.2-prime1.
Timeline
- CVE published
- First seen by cve.now
- Record last updated
Affected versions
- Kubernetes ingress-nginx
All versions
- SUSE Rancher Prime RKE2 ingress-nginx
fixed in 1.15.2-prime1
Evidence 2
- Advisory
- Link
Corrections
None so far.
Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.
Questions about CVE-2026-116472
Is CVE-2026-116472 being exploited?
It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data
Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-116472?
ingress-nginx: all versions. Rancher Prime RKE2 ingress-nginx: before 1.15.2-prime1.Source: cve.now feed data
How do I fix CVE-2026-116472?
Upgrade to a fixed version: 1.15.2-prime1.Source: cve.now feed data