Skip to main content
← All vulnerabilities
CVE-2026-112921

Robots::Validate versions from 0.4.3 before 0.4.10 for Perl report clients as imposter robots when User-Agent matcher state carries over…

Published
Last modified
published
Not listed in CISA KEV
Unclear
Fix
Fixed in 0.4.10
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
  • Exploitation: none
  • Automatable: yes
  • Technical impact: partial

Summary

Robots::Validate versions from 0.4.3 before 0.4.10 for Perl report clients as imposter robots when User-Agent matcher state carries over from a previous request. Each Robots::Validate object holds one pure-Perl Aho-Corasick search machine and feeds every User-Agent into it without resetting its state. A User-Agent that ends part-way through a robot name leaves the machine mid-match, so the next User-Agent checked by the same object can complete that name. That client's address is then checked against the robot's DNS rule, which it fails. A remote client can use this to make a site that blocks bad robots block other visitors where the prefix User-Agent string is a suffix of a robot being validated. Note that deployments with Algorithm::AhoCorasick::XS are also affected, since it was unused due to a different bug.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now
  3. CISA SSVC assessment

    Exploitation: none · Automatable: yes · Technical impact: partial

  4. Record last updated

Affected versions

  • Robots-Validate

    From 0.4.3 · fixed in 0.4.10

References 3

GitHub · robrwo/Robots-Validate

metacpan.org

FAQ

Questions about CVE-2026-112921

What does this mean?

Robots::Validate can report a client as an imposter robot when matcher state from one User-Agent carries over into the next validation. The tail of one request's User-Agent and the head of the next are then matched as a single string.Source: github.com

Am I affected, and how do I check?

Versions from 0.4.3 up to, but not including, 0.4.10 are affected. The problem needs a single Robots::Validate object reused across several validations, and it shows up on the pure-Perl matcher branch rather than the compiled one. Check your installed version with the module's version number and see whether your code reuses one object for multiple checks.Source: github.com

What should I do about it?

Upgrade to 0.4.10 or later.Source: github.com

Is it being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data