Skip to main content
← Vulnerabilities

Apache Syncope: Remote Code Execution via Flowable JUEL expression

Affects Apache Syncope 3.0.0-M0 to 3.0.16, 4.0.0-M0 to 4.0.8 and 4.1.0 to 4.1.3 when a BPMN process with a JUEL expression is imported and started. Upgrade to 4.0.9 or 4.1.4.

Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.

9.8CriticalCISA-ADP
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
Fixed in 4.0.9, 4.1.4
Who is exposed
Not reported

Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 4.0.9, 4.1.4.

Published
Last modified
0.52% · 44th percentile
40/100
Unclear
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
On X
View the cve.now post
  • Exploitation: none
  • Automatable: yes
  • Technical impact: total

Summary

Apache Syncope, an open-source identity management system, is affected by this vulnerability. An administrator with sufficient privileges can import a malicious workflow definition and start it, allowing arbitrary code to run on the underlying server.

Read the original description

Improper isolation or compartmentalization vulnerability in Apache Syncope.

An administrator with adequate entitlements can import arbitrary BPMN process definitions via the REST API and then start the process. When a BPMN process containing a JUEL expression is imported and started, the expression is executed directly on the server, with no sandbox.

This issue affects Apache Syncope: from 3.0.0-M0 through 3.0.16, from 4.0.0-M0 through 4.0.8, from 4.1.0 through 4.1.3.

Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.0.9 / 4.1.4, which fix this issue by rejecting BPMN definitions including expression attributes.

cve.now Index

40cve.now Index 40 of 100 · methodology v3
  • Exploitation0/40No signal
  • Exposure20/25No login or user action needed, CISA rates it automatable · Unknown: Advisories don't say whether default setups are affected
  • Reach10/20Affects Maven packages
  • Severity10/10CVSS 9.8, total technical impact per CISA
  • No patch0/5No signal

What would change the score

  • Would score about 85 if added to CISA KEV
  • Would score about 80 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
  • Would score about 45 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed

What to do

  • Upgrade to a fixed version: 4.0.9, 4.1.4.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now4 days
  3. CISA SSVC assessment

    Exploitation: none · Automatable: yes · Technical impact: total

  4. Record last updated
  5. Posted on X by cve.now

Affected versions

  • org.apache.syncope.ext.flowable:syncope-ext-flowable-bpmnMaven

    From 3.0.0-M0 · through 3.0.16; From 4.0.0-M0 · through 4.0.8; From 4.1.0 · through 4.1.3

Evidence 2

  1. Advisory
  2. Link

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

Questions about CVE-2026-109083

Is CVE-2026-109083 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data

What does this mean?

When a BPMN process containing a JUEL expression is imported and started, Apache Syncope runs that expression directly on the server with no sandbox. This gives remote code execution on the server.Source: openwall.com

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-109083?

org.apache.syncope.ext.flowable:syncope-ext-flowable-bpmn (Maven): from 3.0.0-M0 through 3.0.16; from 4.0.0-M0 through 4.0.8; from 4.1.0 through 4.1.3.Source: cve.now feed data

Am I affected, and how do I check?

Affected versions are Apache Syncope 3.0.0-M0 through 3.0.16, 4.0.0-M0 through 4.0.8, and 4.1.0 through 4.1.3. Check the installed Syncope version against these ranges, and check whether BPMN processes containing JUEL expressions are imported and started on the installation.Source: openwall.com

How do I fix CVE-2026-109083?

The vendor recommends upgrading to version 4.0.9 or 4.1.4. No workaround is listed in the facts.Source: openwall.com