Skip to main content
cve.nowby Sazabi
← Vulnerabilities
CVE-2026-108167

The auth0-ai-python FGA retriever does not distinguish between authorization checks under different users, relations, or conditions when…

Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
Fixed in auth0-ai-langchain 1.0.2 · auth0-ai-llamaindex 1.0.3
Who is exposed
Not reported

Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: auth0-ai-langchain 1.0.2 · auth0-ai-llamaindex 1.0.3.

Published
Last modified
Reference
Last checked
10/100 · provisional
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub

Summary

The FGA retriever in auth0-ai-python does not distinguish between authorization checks for different users, relations, or conditions during retrieval-augmented generation. As a result, documents that Auth0 FGA denies can be included in the model context and used in generated responses.

Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.

Read the original description

The auth0-ai-python FGA retriever does not distinguish between authorization checks under different users, relations, or conditions when filtering documents during retrieval-augmented generation, resulting in documents denied by Auth0 FGA being included in the model context and used in the generated response.

cve.now Index

10Pcve.now Index 10 of 100 · methodology v3 · provisional
  • Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
  • Exposure?/25Unknown. No advisory context yet
  • Reach10/20Affects PyPI packages
  • Severity?/10Unknown. No CVSS score or vendor rating
  • No patch0/5No signal

What would change the score

  • Would score about 65 if added to CISA KEV
  • Would score about 60 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
  • Would score about 32 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed

How the score works · Rankings

What to do

  • Upgrade to a fixed version: auth0-ai-langchain 1.0.2 · auth0-ai-llamaindex 1.0.3.

Check your systems with an agent

Paste this into a coding or ops agent. It checks your systems read-only and reports a table per asset.

Check whether my systems are affected by CVE-2026-108167 (The auth0-ai-python FGA retriever does not distinguish between authorization checks under different users, relations, or conditions when…), using the cve.now data below.

Rules: work read-only. Do not run exploit code, proof-of-concept scripts or scanners that send attack payloads, and do not change any configuration, package, image or deployment. Report findings only.

What cve.now has for CVE-2026-108167 (entry last updated 2026-11-10):
Affected:
- PyPI package auth0-ai-langchain: fixed in 1.0.2
- PyPI package auth0-ai-llamaindex: fixed in 1.0.3
Fixed versions: 1.0.2, 1.0.3.
Setup: unknown whether the bug needs a non-default feature or setting. Check the advisory.
CISA KEV: CVE-2026-108167 is not listed as of cve.now's last read.
This KEV status is for CVE-2026-108167 only. If you also check another CVE, look up its own KEV status; never assume it from this one.

How to check:
- Packages (PyPI): find every lockfile in each project and run check_stack from the cve.now MCP server on each one. Compare the resolved versions, not the ranges a manifest declares, with the affected versions above. Include transitive dependencies.

Verify against the linked advisories before concluding, and cite the date you read each one:
- https://trust.okta.com/security-advisories/improper-access-control-in-auth0-ai-python-document-retrieval-cve-2026-108167
Do not conclude an asset is unaffected unless you checked it and the evidence covers both its version and the conditions above. If you could not check something, mark it unknown and say what is missing.

Report a table with one row per asset and these columns: Asset | Version or build | Status (affected, fixed, not applicable, unknown) | Compensating controls | Exposure (internet-facing, internal, none) | Evidence | Next action.

Entry: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-108167
For follow-up questions, use the cve.now MCP server at https://mcp.cve.now/mcp (no authentication), for example get_vulnerability with id CVE-2026-108167.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now

Affected versions

Evidence 3

CVE record · 2

Establishes: The identifier and description.

  1. Record
  2. Record

Other links · 1

  1. Advisory

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

Questions about CVE-2026-108167

Is CVE-2026-108167 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-108167?

auth0-ai-langchain (PyPI): before 1.0.2. auth0-ai-llamaindex (PyPI): before 1.0.3.Source: cve.now feed data

How do I fix CVE-2026-108167?

Upgrade to a fixed version: auth0-ai-langchain 1.0.2 · auth0-ai-llamaindex 1.0.3.Source: cve.now feed data

Sources

Related

More vulnerabilities