Skip to main content
← Vulnerabilities

Potential memory exhaustion in MultiPartParser via base64-encoded file upload

Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.

5.3MediumCNA
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
Fixed in 6.1.3, 6.0.10, 5.2.19
Who is exposed
Not reported

Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 6.1.3, 6.0.10, 5.2.19.

45Pcve.now Index 45 of 100 · methodology v3 · provisional
  • Exploitation0/40No signal
  • Exposure20/25No login or user action needed per the CVSS vector, CISA rates it automatable · Data gap: No advisory context yet
  • Reach20/20django: 11.9M downloads a week
  • Severity5.3/10CVSS 5.3
  • No patch0/5No signal

What would change the score

  • Would score about 90 if added to CISA KEV
  • Would score about 85 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
  • Would score about 50 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed

CVE-2026-108147 is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. No public exploit code is tracked. It is rated CVSS 5.3 (medium) and affects Django; fixed in 6.1.3, 6.0.10 and 5.2.19.

Published
Last modified
Published
Not listed in CISA KEV
45/100 · provisional
Fix
Fixed in 6.1.3, 6.0.10, 5.2.19
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
  • Exploitation: none
  • Automatable: yes
  • Technical impact: partial

Summary

Django, the Python web framework, is affected in its multipart form and file upload parser, where base64-encoded file uploads can consume excessive server memory. This could let an attacker cause memory exhaustion, potentially slowing or crashing the application.

Read the original description

An issue was discovered in Django 6.1 before 6.1.3, 6.0.4 before 6.0.10, and 5.2.13 before 5.2.19. `django.http.multipartparser.MultiPartParser` is subject to excessive memory consumption when processing multipart file uploads with base64 `Content-Transfer-Encoding`, which could be buffered entirely in memory before being passed to upload handlers. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Ignacy Kujawa for reporting this issue.

Impact

  • Widely used

    django has 11.9m weekly downloads.Source: pypistats.org

    12.1k packages depend on django.Source: deps.dev

What to do

  • Upgrade to a fixed version: 6.1.3, 6.0.10, 5.2.19.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now
  3. CISA SSVC assessment

    Exploitation: none · Automatable: yes · Technical impact: partial

  4. Record last updated

Affected versions

  • djangoPyPI

    From 6.1 · fixed in 6.1.3; From 6.0.4 · fixed in 6.0.10; From 5.2.13 · fixed in 5.2.19

Evidence 7

  1. Advisory
  2. Advisory
  3. Patch
  4. Patch
  5. Patch
Show all 7 sourcesShow fewer sources
  1. Patch
  2. Link

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

FAQ

Questions about CVE-2026-108147

Is CVE-2026-108147 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-108147?

django (PyPI): from 6.1 before 6.1.3; from 6.0.4 before 6.0.10; from 5.2.13 before 5.2.19.Source: cve.now feed data

How do I fix CVE-2026-108147?

Upgrade to a fixed version: 6.1.3, 6.0.10, 5.2.19.Source: cve.now feed data