Skip to main content
← All vulnerabilities
CVE-2026-107262EUVD-2026-113558GHSA-853X-GQ38-FJM7

Advanced Filesystem - Moderately critical - Cross-Site Request Forgery - SA-CONTRIB-2026-217

Only affects Drupal Advanced Filesystem before 1.0.28 when the Backup submodule (advanced_filesystem_backup) is enabled. Fixed in 1.0.28.

Published
Last modified
published
Not listed in CISA KEV
Unclear
Fix
Fixed in 1.0.28
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
  • Exploitation: none
  • Automatable: yes
  • Technical impact: partial

Summary

This vulnerability affects the Advanced Filesystem module for Drupal, a content management system add-on. An attacker could trick a logged-in user into unknowingly submitting requests that perform actions on the site without their consent.

Summarized by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5. Verify details against the original sources.

Read the original description

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Advanced Filesystem allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Advanced Filesystem versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.0.28.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now
  3. CISA SSVC assessment

    Exploitation: none · Automatable: yes · Technical impact: partial

  4. Record last updated

Affected versions

  • Drupal Advanced Filesystem

    From 0.0.0 · fixed in 1.0.28

References 1

drupal.org

FAQ

Questions about CVE-2026-107262

What does this mean?

The flaw is a cross-site request forgery issue. An attacker can trick a logged-in user into performing actions they did not intend through the site.Source: drupal.org

Am I affected, and how do I check?

Versions before 1.0.28 are affected, but only when the Advanced Filesystem: Backup submodule (advanced_filesystem_backup) is enabled. Check the installed module version and whether that submodule is enabled in the site's module list.Source: drupal.org

What should I do about it?

Upgrade Advanced File System to 1.0.28. The advisory names 1.0.28 as the fixed version.Source: drupal.org

Is it being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data