Skip to main content
← All vulnerabilities
CVE-2026-107257EUVD-2026-113577GHSA-49QR-J2V8-5WG8

Actstream - Critical - Access bypass - SA-CONTRIB-2026-198

Actstream versions before 2.0.1, and 2.1.0 before 2.1.1, are affected by this access bypass. Upgrade to Actstream 2.1.1 to fix it.

Published
Last modified
published
Not listed in CISA KEV
Unclear
Fix
Fixed in 2.0.1, 2.1.1
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
  • Exploitation: none
  • Automatable: yes
  • Technical impact: partial

Summary

The Actstream module for Drupal, a tool that records and displays user activity streams, is affected by this flaw. Attackers can exploit it to reach content they should not be able to access by directly requesting pages, bypassing the intended access restrictions.

Summarized by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5. Verify details against the original sources.

Read the original description

Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Actstream allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Actstream versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.0.1, from 2.1.0 to 2.1.1.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now
  3. CISA SSVC assessment

    Exploitation: none · Automatable: yes · Technical impact: partial

  4. Record last updated

Affected versions

  • Drupal Actstream

    From 0.0.0 · fixed in 2.0.1; From 2.1.0 · fixed in 2.1.1

References 1

drupal.org

FAQ

Questions about CVE-2026-107257

What does this mean?

The configuration route does not check that the user is the account owner or a user administrator. This lets the access check be bypassed, so configuration for other users' activity streams can be edited.Source: drupal.org

Am I affected, and how do I check?

Actstream versions before 2.0.1, and version 2.1.0 before 2.1.1, are affected. Check the installed Actstream version and compare it with these ranges.Source: drupal.org

What should I do about it?

Upgrade to Actstream 2.1.1. The facts list no workaround.Source: drupal.org

Is it being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data