Skip to main content
← Vulnerabilities

Pubjet | پاب‌جت <= 5.4.8 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Privilege Escalation to 'check-token' AJAX Action

7.6HighCNA
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
No fix listed
Who is exposed
Not reported
Published
Last modified
16/100 · provisional
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
  • Exploitation: none
  • Automatable: no
  • Technical impact: partial

Summary

Pubjet, a WordPress plugin, has a flaw that lets a logged-in user with only Subscriber-level access take over the plugin's stored API credential and gain the privileges of an authorized API client, allowing them to create, modify, and delete reportage posts. The attack can be carried out remotely by any user who has a low-level account on the site and needs no action from anyone else.

Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.

Read the original description

The Pubjet | پاب‌جت plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation in all versions up to, and including, 5.4.8. This is due to the checkToken() AJAX handler — registered under wp_ajax_pubjet-check-token — performing no capability check and no nonce verification before unconditionally writing the attacker-supplied token GET parameter directly into the site-wide pubjet_settings option via pubjet_update_setting(), prior to any remote validation. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to overwrite the plugin's stored REST API credential with an attacker-chosen value, immediately elevating their effective privileges to those of an authorized Pubjet API client and enabling them to invoke otherwise-restricted endpoints — createReportage, updateReportage, deleteReportage, toggleCopyright, and createBacklink — to create, modify, and delete arbitrary reportage posts and manipulate plugin state that Subscribers cannot normally access. The privilege escalation is self-reinforcing: because RestApi::isTokenValid() authenticates solely by comparing the incoming Authorization header against the value returned by pubjet_token(), which reads from the same option the unprotected handler writes to, the attacker-planted token is trusted as legitimate on all subsequent requests.

cve.now Index

16Pcve.now Index 16 of 100 · methodology v3 · provisional
  • Exploitation0/40No signal
  • Exposure3/25Reachable over the network · Unknown: No advisory context yet
  • Reach?/20Unknown. No tracked technology or package matched
  • Severity7.6/10CVSS 7.6
  • No patch5/5No patch listed yet

What would change the score

  • Would score about 71 if added to CISA KEV
  • Would score about 66 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
  • Would score about 35 if advisories confirm default setups are exposed

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now
  3. CISA SSVC assessment

    Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial

  4. Record last updated

Affected versions

  • pubjet Pubjet | پاب‌جت

    through 5.4.8

Evidence 6

  1. Link
  2. Link
  3. Link
  4. Link
  5. Link
  6. Link

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

Questions about CVE-2026-103479

Is CVE-2026-103479 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-103479?

Pubjet | پاب‌جت: through 5.4.8.Source: cve.now feed data