Skip to main content
← All vulnerabilities
CVE-2026-103092EUVD-2026-113153GHSA-7CHH-VP86-3P56

Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilities

Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 are affected. Upgrading to 1.12.4 fixes the issue. The sources do not give a vendor severity rating.

Published
Last modified
published
Not listed in CISA KEV
Specific setups only
Fix
Fixed in 1.12.4
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
  • Exploitation: none
  • Automatable: no
  • Technical impact: partial

Summary

IBM Langflow OSS is affected, and a logged-in remote attacker could exploit improper access control to run arbitrary SQL commands against the database. This could allow the attacker to read, modify, or delete data beyond what they should be permitted to access.

Summarized by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5. Verify details against the original sources.

Read the original description

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands due to improper access control.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now
  3. CISA SSVC assessment

    Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial

  4. Record last updated

Affected versions

  • IBM Langflow OSS

    From 1.0.0 · through 1.12.3

References 1

ibm.com

FAQ

Questions about CVE-2026-103092

What does this mean?

The sources name multiple vulnerabilities in Langflow OSS but do not describe what each flaw does. The available facts do not give the impact.Source: ibm.com

Am I affected, and how do I check?

Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 are in the affected range. To check an installation, look up the installed Langflow OSS version and compare it with that range.Source: ibm.com

What should I do about it?

Upgrade Langflow OSS to version 1.12.4, which the advisory names as the fix. No workaround is listed in the facts.Source: ibm.com

Is it being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data