Skip to main content
Menu
CVEs

CVE

SoftBank Air Terminal 6 root command execution in web management console

Affects SoftBank Corp. Air Terminal 6 firmware v1.01.80 and earlier, where a user who can log in to the web management console can run commands as root.

CVE-2026-101107EUVD-2026-124267GHSA-4WGW-WQJ3-325X

Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.

8.0HighCNA
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
No fix listed
Who is exposed
Specific setups only

Do first: Check whether your setup matches what the bug needs. Air Terminal 6 firmware v1.01.80 and earlier

Published
Last modified
Reference
Last checked
1.03% · 64th percentile
18/100 · provisional
Specific setups only
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub

Summary

An OS command injection flaw in SoftBank Corp.'s Air Terminal 6 lets a user who can log in to the product's web management console run arbitrary commands with root privileges. The attacker must be on an adjacent network and needs low-level login access.

Read the original description

An OS command Injection issue exists in Air Terminal 6 provided by SoftBank Corp. Arbitrary commands may be executed with the root privilege by a user who can log in to the web management console of the affected product.

Who should check

Owners and administrators of SoftBank Air Terminal 6 devices running firmware v1.01.80 or earlier

Read the source excerpt

“Air Terminal 6 v1.01.80 and earlier”

jvn.jp

cve.now Index

18Pcve.now Index 18 of 100 · methodology v3 · provisional
  • Exploitation?/40Unknown. No CISA SSVC exploitation rating yet
  • Exposure5/25Specific setups only
  • Reach?/20Unknown. No tracked technology or package matched
  • Severity8/10CVSS 8.0
  • No patch5/5No patch listed yet

What would change the score

  • Would score about 68 if added to CISA KEV
  • Would score about 63 if CISA's SSVC rates exploitation active
  • Would score about 28 if CISA's SSVC rates it automatable

What to do

  • Check whether your setup matches what the bug needs.

    Air Terminal 6 firmware v1.01.80 and earlier
  • Workaround: No fix is listed in the available facts. Limiting who can log in to the web management console reduces the exposure, since that login is what the flaw requires.

Check your systems with an agent

Paste this into a coding or ops agent. It checks your systems read-only and reports a table per asset.

Check whether my systems are affected by CVE-2026-101107 (An OS command Injection issue exists in Air Terminal 6 provided by SoftBank Corp.), using the cve.now data below.

Rules: work read-only. Do not run exploit code, proof-of-concept scripts or scanners that send attack payloads, and do not change any configuration, package, image or deployment. Report findings only.

What cve.now has for CVE-2026-101107 (entry last updated 2026-11-12):
Affected:
- SoftBank Corp. Air Terminal 6: through v1.01.80
Fixed versions: none listed yet.
Conditions (all must be true for the bug to be hit):
- Air Terminal 6 firmware v1.01.80 and earlier (source: https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN64740097/)
Setup: unknown whether the bug needs a non-default feature or setting. Check the advisory.
Attacker needs: adjacent access, low-privilege login, no user action.
CISA KEV: CVE-2026-101107 is not listed as of cve.now's last read.
This KEV status is for CVE-2026-101107 only. If you also check another CVE, look up its own KEV status; never assume it from this one.

How to check:
- Installed software: check what is actually running, not what a repo declares. Read the version from each host, container image and Kubernetes node (the binary's version output, the OS package database, image layers), and check whether the conditions above hold there. Distribution packages may carry a backported fix under an older version number; confirm against the distribution's own advisory.

Verify against the linked advisories before concluding, and cite the date you read each one:
- https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN64740097/
Do not conclude an asset is unaffected unless you checked it and the evidence covers both its version and the conditions above. If you could not check something, mark it unknown and say what is missing.

Report a table with one row per asset and these columns: Asset | Version or build | Status (affected, fixed, not applicable, unknown) | Compensating controls | Exposure (internet-facing, internal, none) | Evidence | Next action.

Entry: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-101107
For follow-up questions, use the cve.now MCP server at https://mcp.cve.now/mcp (no authentication), for example execute with name cve.get and arguments {"id": "CVE-2026-101107"}.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now

Affected versions

  • SoftBank Corp. Air Terminal 6

    through v1.01.80

Evidence 3

CVE record · 2

Establishes: The identifier and description.

  1. Record
  2. Record

Other links · 1

  1. Link

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

Questions about CVE-2026-101107

Is CVE-2026-101107 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data

What does this mean?

An OS command injection flaw lets a user who can log in to the web management console run arbitrary commands with root privilege on the device.Source: jvn.jp

Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-101107?

Air Terminal 6: through v1.01.80.Source: cve.now feed data

Am I affected, and how do I check?

Air Terminal 6 firmware v1.01.80 and earlier are affected. To check a device, compare its firmware version against v1.01.80.Source: jvn.jp

How do I fix CVE-2026-101107?

The available facts name no fixed firmware version or patch IDs, so check SoftBank Corp.'s advisory for a fix before taking action.Source: jvn.jp

What if there's no patch?

No fix is listed in the available facts. Limiting who can log in to the web management console reduces the exposure, since that login is what the flaw requires.Source: jvn.jp