Skip to main content
← All vulnerabilities
CVE-2025-68393EUVD-2025-211225GHSA-FXXW-WH9Q-438C

SQL Injection in Protectel

Published
Last modified
published
Not listed in CISA KEV
Specific setups only
Fix
Fixed in 6.5.19, 6.4.67
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
  • Exploitation: none
  • Automatable: no
  • Technical impact: total

Summary

The ARKETEAM Protectel modules PROTECTELMAJ and BDF are affected. A low-privileged user can inject malicious SQL through the "Utilisateur" input, which could allow an attacker to read, modify, or delete data in the underlying database.

Summarized by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5. Verify details against the original sources.

Read the original description

ARKETEAM Protectel modules PROTECTELMAJ and BDF are vulnerable to SQL injection vulnerability. Improper neutralization of input provided by a low privileged user into "Utilisateur" parameter allows for SQL Injection attacks. This issue has been fixed in: PROTECTELMAJ v6.5.19 and BDF v6.4.67

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now
  3. CISA SSVC assessment

    Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: total

  4. Record last updated

Affected versions

  • ARKETEAM PROTECTELMAJ

    fixed in 6.5.19

  • ARKETEAM BDF

    fixed in 6.4.67

References 2

protectel.arketeam.com

cert.pl

FAQ

Questions about CVE-2025-68393

What does this mean?

The facts do not describe how the SQL injection works or what an attacker could reach through it, so no further detail can be given here.Source: cert.pl

Am I affected, and how do I check?

PROTECTELMAJ versions before 6.5.19 and BDF versions before 6.4.67 are listed as affected. To check a installation, look up the PROTECTELMAJ or BDF version it runs and compare it with these numbers.Source: cert.pl

What should I do about it?

Upgrade PROTECTELMAJ to 6.5.19 or later, and BDF to 6.4.67 or later. The fixed releases are PROTECTELMAJ v6.5.19 and BDF v6.4.67.Source: cert.pl

Is it being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data