Skip to main content
← Vulnerabilities

In multiple functions of MediaQualityService.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check.

The Android bulletin lists this MediaQualityService permission bypass as fixed in Android 16-qpr2 and 17, with no version ranges given for affected builds.

Written by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 from the sources below. Verify against them.

—Not rated
Exploited
No known exploitation
Fix
Fixed in 16-qpr2, 17
Who is exposed
Not reported

Do first: Upgrade to a fixed version: 16-qpr2, 17.

Published
Last modified
Published
Not listed in CISA KEV
0/100 · provisional
Unclear
Fix
Fixed in 16-qpr2, 17
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub

Summary

In multiple functions of MediaQualityService.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

What to do

  • Upgrade to a fixed version: 16-qpr2, 17.

Timeline

  1. CVE published
  2. First seen by cve.now

Affected versions

  • Google Android

    17, 16-qpr2

Evidence 1

  1. Link

Corrections

None so far.

Something wrong on this page? Report an error. Every fix is listed here.

FAQ

Questions about CVE-2026-58969

What does this mean?

Several functions in MediaQualityService.java are missing a permission check, which allows a permission bypass. The bulletin lists the impact as information disclosure.Source: source.android.com

Am I affected, and how do I check?

The checked facts name Google Android but give no affected version ranges or setup conditions. To compare a device, check its Android version against the fixed releases 16-qpr2 and 17 in the bulletin.Source: source.android.com

What should I do about it?

Update to Android 16-qpr2 or Android 17, the versions the bulletin lists as fixed.Source: source.android.com

Is it being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.Source: cve.now feed data