CVEs with an EPSS score above 30%
Every CVE with at least a 30% EPSS chance of exploitation in the next 30 days: 7,156 as of 2026-11-06, highest first.
- CVE-2022-44635Apache Fineract allowed an authenticated user to perform remote code execution due to path traversalApache Software Foundation Apache Fineract
- CVE-2008-0960SNMPv3 HMAC verification in (1) Net-SNMP 5.2.x before 5.2.4.1, 5.3.x before 5.3.2.1, and 5.4.x before 5.4.1.1; (2) UCD-SNMP; (3) eCos; (4)…
- CVE-2014-6039ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer version 7 through 9.9 build 9002 has a Credentials Disclosure Vulnerability.
- CVE-2024-54676Apache OpenMeetings: Deserialisation of untrusted data in cluster modeApache Software Foundation Apache OpenMeetings · org.apache…
- CVE-2005-0095The WCCP message parsing code in Squid 2.5.STABLE7 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via malformed…
- CVE-2021-21983Arbitrary file write vulnerability in vRealize Operations Manager API (CVE-2021-21983) prior to 8.4 may allow an authenticated malicious…VMware vRealize Operations
- CVE-2006-1255Stack-based buffer overflow in the IMAP service in Mercur Messaging 5.0 SP3 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of…
- CVE-2025-22037ksmbd: fix null pointer dereference in alloc_preauth_hash()Linux
- CVE-2007-2545Multiple PHP remote file inclusion vulnerabilities in Persism CMS 0.9.2 and earlier allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code…
- CVE-2017-9829'/cgi-bin/admin/downloadMedias.cgi' of the web service in most of the VIVOTEK Network Cameras is vulnerable, which allows remote attackers…
- CVE-2000-0886IIS 5.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a malformed request for an executable file whose name is appended with…
- CVE-2017-18044A Command Injection issue was discovered in ContentStore/Base/CVDataPipe.dll in Commvault before v11 SP6.
- CVE-2017-8670Microsoft Edge in Microsoft Windows 10 1607, 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of…Microsoft Scripting Engine
- CVE-2012-5687Directory traversal vulnerability in the web-based management feature on the TP-LINK TL-WR841N router with firmware 3.13.9 build 120201…
- CVE-2017-6077ping.cgi on NETGEAR DGN2200 devices with firmware through 10.0.0.50 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary OS commands via s
- CVE-2007-4313PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in public_includes/pub_blocks/activecontent.php in Php Blue Dragon CMS 3.0.0 allows remote…
- CVE-2014-9614The Web Panel in Netsweeper before 4.0.5 has a default password of branding for the branding account, which makes it easier for remote…
- CVE-2004-0567The Windows Internet Naming Service (WINS) in Windows NT Server 4.0 SP 6a, NT Terminal Server 4.0 SP 6, Windows 2000 Server SP3 and SP4…
- CVE-2012-5896The Annotation Objects Extension ActiveX control in AnnotateX.dll in Quest InTrust 10.4.0.853 and earlier does not properly implement the…
- CVE-2007-3057PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in include/wysiwyg/spaw_control.class.php in the icontent 4.5 module for XOOPS allows remote…
- CVE-2021-40324Cobbler before 3.3.0 allows arbitrary file write operations via upload_log_data.cobbler
- CVE-2019-0626A memory corruption vulnerability exists in the Windows Server DHCP service when an attacker sends specially crafted packets to a DHCP…Microsoft Windows
- CVE-2015-7611Apache James Server 2.3.2, when configured with file-based user repositories, allows attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via…org.apache.james:james-server
- CVE-2025-13486Advanced Custom Fields: Extended 0.9.0.5 - 0.9.1.1 - Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution in prepare_formhwk-fr Advanced Custom Fields: Extended
- CVE-2009-0695hagent.exe in Wyse Device Manager (WDM) 4.7.x does not require authentication for commands, which allows remote attackers to obtain…
- CVE-2009-2227Stack-based buffer overflow in B Labs Bopup Communication Server 3.2.26.5460 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a…
- CVE-2019-9053An issue was discovered in CMS Made Simple 2.2.8.
- CVE-2020-13951Attackers can use public NetTest web service of Apache OpenMeetings 4.0.0-5.0.0 to organize denial of service attack.Apache OpenMeetings · org.apache.openmeetings:openmeetings-…
- CVE-2020-13117Wavlink WN575A4, WN579X3, and WN530G3A devices through 2020-05-15 allow unauthenticated remote users to inject commands via the key…
- CVE-2009-2990Array index error in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 9.x before 9.2, 8.x before 8.1.7, and possibly 7.x through 7.1.4 might allow attackers to…
Get alerts when a CVE crosses 30% EPSS
Only want the packages you use? Check a lockfile to get a feed for your stack.
https://cve.now/epss/feed
Paste into Feedly or any RSS reader, or run /feed subscribe https://cve.now/epss/feed in Slack. For email alerts, give it to an RSS-to-email service.
https://cve.now/epss/feed?format=atom
The same entries as Atom, for readers that prefer it.
https://cve.now/epss/feed?format=json
The same entries as JSON Feed 1.1, for scripts and readers that support it.
Frequently asked questions
What is an EPSS score?
The Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS) estimates the probability that a CVE will be exploited in the wild in the next 30 days, from 0 to 100%. FIRST.org publishes a new score for every published CVE each day, using a model trained on observed exploitation activity.
What does the EPSS percentile mean?
The percentile ranks a CVE's score against every other CVE's. A CVE in the 95th percentile scores higher than 95% of all CVEs, even when its probability looks small, because most CVEs score well under 1%. For example, a CVE with EPSS 0.42 and percentile 0.99 has a 42% chance of exploitation within 30 days and scores higher than 99% of CVEs.
What is the difference between EPSS and CVSS?
CVSS measures how severe a vulnerability would be if exploited; EPSS measures how likely exploitation is. A CVSS 9.8 bug nobody targets can have an EPSS under 1%, while a CVSS 6.5 bug in a widely scanned product can score above 50%. Use both: CVSS for impact, EPSS for likelihood.
What is a good EPSS threshold?
There is no single cutoff. Many teams prioritize CVEs above 10% (roughly the top 4% of all CVEs) and treat anything above 30% as urgent. cve.now flags a high-severity CVE as critical once its EPSS reaches 10%.
How do EPSS and CISA KEV work together?
KEV lists vulnerabilities already exploited; EPSS predicts which will be. Patch everything on KEV first, then work down by EPSS score, starting with the highest-severity CVEs in your stack.