CVEs with an EPSS score above 30%
Every CVE with at least a 30% EPSS chance of exploitation in the next 30 days: 7,160 as of 2026-11-08, highest first.
- CVE-2017-14463An exploitable access control vulnerability exists in the data, program, and function file permissions functionality of Allen Bradley…Talos Allen Bradley
- CVE-2016-0121The Adobe Type Manager Library in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows…
- CVE-2017-18349parseObject in Fastjson before 1.2.25, as used in FastjsonEngine in Pippo 1.11.0 and other products, allows remote attackers to execute…com.alibaba:fastjson · ro.pippo:pippo-fastjson
- CVE-2020-10884This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers execute arbitrary code on affected installations of TP-Link Archer A7 Firmware Ver…TP-Link Archer A7
- CVE-2008-1442Heap-based buffer overflow in the substringData method in Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 and 7 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary…
- CVE-2013-5093The renderLocalView function in render/views.py in graphite-web in Graphite 0.9.5 through 0.9.10 uses the pickle Python module unsafely…graphite-web
- CVE-2018-1000094CMS Made Simple version 2.2.5 contains a Remote Code Execution vulnerability in File Manager that can result in Allows an authenticated…
- CVE-2025-57791Argument Injection Vulnerability in CommServeCommvault CommCell
- CVE-2003-0161The prescan() function in the address parser (parseaddr.c) in Sendmail before 8.12.9 does not properly handle certain conversions from…
- CVE-2012-2174The URL handler in IBM Lotus Notes 8.x before 8.5.3 FP2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted notes:// URL.
- CVE-2009-3641Snort before 2.8.5.1, when the -v option is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a…
- CVE-2011-2748The server in ISC DHCP 3.x and 4.x before 4.2.2, 3.1-ESV before 3.1-ESV-R3, and 4.1-ESV before 4.1-ESV-R3 allows remote attackers to cause…
- CVE-2011-2749The server in ISC DHCP 3.x and 4.x before 4.2.2, 3.1-ESV before 3.1-ESV-R3, and 4.1-ESV before 4.1-ESV-R3 allows remote attackers to cause…
- CVE-2005-2612Direct code injection vulnerability in WordPress 1.5.1.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via the…
- CVE-2015-4620name.c in named in ISC BIND 9.7.x through 9.9.x before 9.9.7-P1 and 9.10.x before 9.10.2-P2, when configured as a recursive resolver with…
- CVE-2023-35086ASUS RT-AX56U V2 & RT-AC86U - Format String -1ASUS RT-AX56U · ASUS RT-AC86U
- CVE-2008-0610Stack-based buffer overflow in the ClientConnection::NegotiateProtocolVersion function in vncviewer/ClientConnection.cpp in vncviewer for…
- CVE-2008-0114Unspecified vulnerability in Microsoft Excel 2000 SP3 through 2003 SP2, Viewer 2003, and Office for Mac 2004 allows user-assisted remote…
- CVE-2016-0122Microsoft Excel 2007 SP3, Excel 2010 SP2, Excel 2013 SP1, Excel 2013 RT SP1, Excel 2016, Word 2016 for Mac, Office Compatibility Pack SP3…
- CVE-2001-0554Buffer overflow in BSD-based telnetd telnet daemon on various operating systems allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via…
- CVE-2020-21224A Remote Code Execution vulnerability has been found in Inspur ClusterEngine V4.0.
- CVE-2008-4449Stack-based buffer overflow in mIRC 6.34 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long hostname in a PRIVMSG message.
- CVE-2016-8864named in ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.9-P4, 9.10.x before 9.10.4-P4, and 9.11.x before 9.11.0-P1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of…
- CVE-2019-16314Indexhibit 2.1.5 allows a product reinstallation, with resultant remote code execution, via /ndxzstudio/install.php?p=2.
- CVE-2006-2389Unspecified vulnerability in Microsoft Office 2003 SP1 and SP2, Office XP SP3, Office 2000 SP3, and other products, allows user-assisted…
- CVE-2015-0252internal/XMLReader.cpp in Apache Xerces-C before 3.1.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault and crash)…
- CVE-2023-26609ABUS TVIP 20000-21150 devices allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via shell metacharacters in the /cgi-bin/mft/wireless_mft…
- CVE-2012-6636The Android API before 17 does not properly restrict the WebView.addJavascriptInterface method, which allows remote attackers to execute…
- CVE-2025-20282Cisco ISE API Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution VulnerabilityCisco Identity Services Engine Software
- CVE-2015-3195The ASN1_TFLG_COMBINE implementation in crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zh, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0t, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1q, and…
Get alerts when a CVE crosses 30% EPSS
Only want the packages you use? Check a lockfile to get a feed for your stack.
https://cve.now/epss/feed
Paste into Feedly or any RSS reader, or run /feed subscribe https://cve.now/epss/feed in Slack. For email alerts, give it to an RSS-to-email service.
https://cve.now/epss/feed?format=atom
The same entries as Atom, for readers that prefer it.
https://cve.now/epss/feed?format=json
The same entries as JSON Feed 1.1, for scripts and readers that support it.
Frequently asked questions
What is an EPSS score?
The Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS) estimates the probability that a CVE will be exploited in the wild in the next 30 days, from 0 to 100%. FIRST.org publishes a new score for every published CVE each day, using a model trained on observed exploitation activity.
What does the EPSS percentile mean?
The percentile ranks a CVE's score against every other CVE's. A CVE in the 95th percentile scores higher than 95% of all CVEs, even when its probability looks small, because most CVEs score well under 1%. For example, a CVE with EPSS 0.42 and percentile 0.99 has a 42% chance of exploitation within 30 days and scores higher than 99% of CVEs.
What is the difference between EPSS and CVSS?
CVSS measures how severe a vulnerability would be if exploited; EPSS measures how likely exploitation is. A CVSS 9.8 bug nobody targets can have an EPSS under 1%, while a CVSS 6.5 bug in a widely scanned product can score above 50%. Use both: CVSS for impact, EPSS for likelihood.
What is a good EPSS threshold?
There is no single cutoff. Many teams prioritize CVEs above 10% (roughly the top 4% of all CVEs) and treat anything above 30% as urgent. cve.now flags a high-severity CVE as critical once its EPSS reaches 10%.
How do EPSS and CISA KEV work together?
KEV lists vulnerabilities already exploited; EPSS predicts which will be. Patch everything on KEV first, then work down by EPSS score, starting with the highest-severity CVEs in your stack.