CVEs with an EPSS score above 30%
Every CVE with at least a 30% EPSS chance of exploitation in the next 30 days: 7,160 as of 2026-11-07, highest first.
- CVE-2014-1823Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Web Components Server in Microsoft Lync Server 2010 and 2013 allows remote attackers to…
- CVE-2009-1537Unspecified vulnerability in the QuickTime Movie Parser Filter in quartz.dll in DirectShow in Microsoft DirectX 7.0 through 9.0c on Windows
- CVE-2017-1000083backend/comics/comics-document.c (aka the comic book backend) in GNOME Evince before 3.24.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary…
- CVE-2010-0033Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office PowerPoint 2003 SP3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted…
- CVE-2008-2431Multiple buffer overflows in Novell iPrint Client before 5.06 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by calling the Novell…
- CVE-2024-32030Remote code execution via JNDI resolution in JMX metrics collection in Kafka UIprovectus kafka-ui
- CVE-2002-0422IIS 5 and 5.1 supporting WebDAV methods allows remote attackers to determine the internal IP address of the system (which may be obscured…
- CVE-2025-43562ColdFusion | Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') (CWE-78)Adobe ColdFusion
- CVE-2014-3206Seagate BlackArmor NAS allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the session parameter to localhost/backupmgt/localJob.php or…
- CVE-2012-1196Directory traversal vulnerability in the VulCore web service (WSVulnerabilityCore/VulCore.asmx) in Lenovo ThinkManagement Console 9.0.3…
- CVE-2018-8495A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Windows Shell improperly handles URIs, aka "Windows Shell Remote Code Execution…Microsoft Windows Server · Microsoft Windows
- CVE-2021-33551UDP Technology/Geutebrück camera devices: Command injection in environment.lang parameter leading to RCEGeutebrück E2 Series · Geutebrück Encoder G-Code
- CVE-2021-33552UDP Technology/Geutebrück camera devices: Command injection in date parameter leading to RCEGeutebrück E2 Series · Geutebrück Encoder G-Code
- CVE-2021-33553UDP Technology/Geutebrück camera devices: Command injection in command parameter leading to RCEGeutebrück E2 Series · Geutebrück Encoder G-Code
- CVE-2018-11763In Apache HTTP Server 2.4.17 to 2.4.34, by sending continuous, large SETTINGS frames a client can occupy a connection, server thread and…Apache Software Foundation Apache HTTP Server
- CVE-2015-2502Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 through 11 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption)
- CVE-2024-2862Password reset vulnerability without authorization on LG LED AssistantLG Electronics LG LED Assistant
- CVE-2016-0199Microsoft Internet Explorer 9 through 11 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory…
- CVE-2022-26960connector.minimal.php in std42 elFinder through 2.1.60 is affected by path traversal.studio-42/elfinder
- CVE-2000-0665GAMSoft TelSrv telnet server 1.5 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a long username.
- CVE-2018-8552An information disclosure vulnerability exists when VBScript improperly discloses the contents of its memory, which could provide an…Microsoft Internet Explorer
- CVE-2000-0869The default configuration of Apache 1.3.12 in SuSE Linux 6.4 enables WebDAV, which allows remote attackers to list arbitrary directories…
- CVE-2014-0282Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 through 11 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption)
- CVE-2024-5084Hash Form – Drag & Drop Form Builder <= 1.1.0 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Upload to Remote Code Executionhashthemes Hash Form – Drag & Drop Form Builder
- CVE-2025-41646RevPi Webstatus application is vulnerable to an authentication bypassKunbus Revolution Pi webstatus
- CVE-2016-5388Apache Tomcat 7.x through 7.0.70 and 8.x through 8.5.4, when the CGI Servlet is enabled, follows RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 and therefore does org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-catalina
- CVE-2024-38094Microsoft SharePoint Remote Code Execution VulnerabilityMicrosoft SharePoint Enterprise Server · Microsoft SharePoi…
- CVE-2016-0487Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Application Testing Suite component in Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control 12.4.0.2 and…
- CVE-2025-7441StoryChief <= 1.0.42 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary File UploadStoryChief
- CVE-2018-1217Avamar Installation Manager in Dell EMC Avamar Server 7.3.1, 7.4.1, and 7.5.0, and Dell EMC Integrated Data Protection Appliance 2.0 and…Dell EMC Avamar, Integrated Data Protection Appliance
Get alerts when a CVE crosses 30% EPSS
Only want the packages you use? Check a lockfile to get a feed for your stack.
https://cve.now/epss/feed
Paste into Feedly or any RSS reader, or run /feed subscribe https://cve.now/epss/feed in Slack. For email alerts, give it to an RSS-to-email service.
https://cve.now/epss/feed?format=atom
The same entries as Atom, for readers that prefer it.
https://cve.now/epss/feed?format=json
The same entries as JSON Feed 1.1, for scripts and readers that support it.
Frequently asked questions
What is an EPSS score?
The Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS) estimates the probability that a CVE will be exploited in the wild in the next 30 days, from 0 to 100%. FIRST.org publishes a new score for every published CVE each day, using a model trained on observed exploitation activity.
What does the EPSS percentile mean?
The percentile ranks a CVE's score against every other CVE's. A CVE in the 95th percentile scores higher than 95% of all CVEs, even when its probability looks small, because most CVEs score well under 1%. For example, a CVE with EPSS 0.42 and percentile 0.99 has a 42% chance of exploitation within 30 days and scores higher than 99% of CVEs.
What is the difference between EPSS and CVSS?
CVSS measures how severe a vulnerability would be if exploited; EPSS measures how likely exploitation is. A CVSS 9.8 bug nobody targets can have an EPSS under 1%, while a CVSS 6.5 bug in a widely scanned product can score above 50%. Use both: CVSS for impact, EPSS for likelihood.
What is a good EPSS threshold?
There is no single cutoff. Many teams prioritize CVEs above 10% (roughly the top 4% of all CVEs) and treat anything above 30% as urgent. cve.now flags a high-severity CVE as critical once its EPSS reaches 10%.
How do EPSS and CISA KEV work together?
KEV lists vulnerabilities already exploited; EPSS predicts which will be. Patch everything on KEV first, then work down by EPSS score, starting with the highest-severity CVEs in your stack.