Nodemailer: A ">" inside a quoted local part ends an angle-addr early in addressparser, delivering to a domain the header does not name
- Published
- Last modified
- Where the record stands: published, rejected by its publisher, or superseded by another id.What do these mean? →
- published
- Whether CISA lists it in its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog: proof that attackers are using it.What do these mean? →
- Not listed in CISA KEV
- The rating the maker of the software gives it. Shown when it differs from the CVSS level.What do these mean? →
- Medium (ghsa)
- Fix
- Fixed in 10.1.4
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
Summary
Nodemailer, the Node.js email-sending library, is affected through its addressparser, which can misread a recipient or sender address containing a ">" inside a quoted local part so that mail is routed to a different domain than the header names. The impact is that an application's recipient allow list can be bypassed, letting attacker-controlled message content be delivered to an attacker's domain, and inbound header parsing with mailparser can disagree with conformant readers.
Summarized by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5. Verify details against the original sources.
Read the original description
Vulnerability summary addressparser ends an angle-addr at the first `>` it sees, including one inside a quoted local part, a comment or a domain literal. The domain is then read off the text in front of that `>`. `<"a@evil.com>"@good.com>` is the mailbox `"a@evil.com>"@good.com` under RFC 5322, and Nodemailer read it as an address at `evil.com`. The unbracketed spelling of the same value was already read correctly. Affected: 3.0.0 through 10.1.3. Attacker capabilities The attacker controls the text of a recipient or sender address that an application passes to Nodemailer, for example a To value entered in a contact or invite form, or the header of an inbound message parsed with mailparser. No access to the application, its configuration or its credentials is needed. The value is a syntactically valid RFC 5322 address that conformant parsers accept without defects. Realistic exploitation scenario An application lets users send invitations or notifications only to addresses at an allowed domain and validates the submitted value with a conformant parser or by checking its domain. The attacker submits `<"a@evil.com>"@good.com>`, which validates as a `good.com` mailbox. Nodemailer then parses the same value, issues `RCPT TO:<"\"a"@evil.com>` and the message, with whatever content the application puts into it, is delivered to the attacker's domain. The security boundary crossed is the application's recipient allow list. In the inbound direction, mailparser reports a different address than a conformant reader of the same header, so a display or policy layer built on the two disagrees. Proof of concept ```js const addressparser = require('nodemailer/lib/addressparser'); console.log(addressparser("<\"a@evil.com>\"@good.com>")); // [ { address: '"a@evil.com', name: '@good.com>' } ] ``` Python's `email._header_value_parser.get_address_list` reads the same value as `"a@evil.com>"@good.com`, with no defects reported. The envelope a message gets is built from the same parse, so `sendMail({ to: "<\"a@evil.com>\"@good.com>" })` issues the RCPT TO shown above. Security impact Mail that an application intends for an allowed domain is delivered to a domain chosen by the attacker, which discloses its content. It is a security vulnerability rather than a parsing bug because the misreading only occurs for values that a conformant validator approves, so validation done the right way is bypassed. Affected are applications that pass user influenced addresses to Nodemailer and consumers of the standalone parser such as mailparser. The fix tracks quoted strings, comments and domain literals inside an angle-addr and reads only a `>` outside them. Found in an internal review of addressparser on 2026-10-18. Verified on 3.0.0, 6.9.16 and 10.1.3.
Timeline
- Advisory published
- Record last updated
- First seen by cve.now
Affected versions
- nodemailernpm
From 3.0.0 · fixed in 10.1.4