CVE-2026-82858GHSA-2FFM-HXRQ-QQMM
@hulumi/drift before 1.3.2 Unsafe Execute Plan Acceptance
- Published
- Last modified
- Where the record stands: published, rejected by its publisher, or superseded by another id.What do these mean? →
- published
- Whether CISA lists it in its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog: proof that attackers are using it.What do these mean? →
- Not listed in CISA KEV
- Fix
- Fixed in 1.3.2
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
CISA's decision points: whether it is exploited, whether attacks can be automated, and how much control an attacker gets. Assessed (SSVC 2.0.3).What do these mean? →
- Exploitation: none
- Automatable: yes
- Technical impact: total
Summary
@hulumi/drift versions before 1.3.2 accept externally supplied execute plans without sufficient provenance validation, allowing untrusted reconciliation input to be treated as trusted. Attackers can supply malicious execute plans that bypass security checks to perform unsafe reconciliation operations.
Timeline
- CVE published
- CISA SSVC assessment
Exploitation: none · Automatable: yes · Technical impact: total
- Record last updated
Affected versions
- hulumi drift
fixed in 1.3.2
- @hulumi/driftnpm
fixed in 1.3.2