Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) through the Report Notifications REST API in Splunk Secure Gateway
- Published
- Last modified
- Where the record stands: published, rejected by its publisher, or superseded by another id.What do these mean? →
- published
- Whether CISA lists it in its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog: proof that attackers are using it.What do these mean? →
- Not listed in CISA KEV
- Fix
- Fixed in 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, 9.4.14, 3.10.9, and 2 more
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
- Exploitation: none
- Automatable: no
- Technical impact: partial
Summary
In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.2, 10.2.6, 10.0.9, and 9.4.14, and Splunk Secure Gateway versions below 3.10.9, 3.9.23, and 3.8.70, a user who does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could use Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in report notifications to send system-authenticated requests to internal Splunk services, which could allow for changes to Search Head Cluster state and a denial of service. The vulnerability is possible because Splunk Secure Gateway does not validate report notification path values before it sends internal requests.
Timeline
- CVE published
- CISA SSVC assessment
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial
- Record last updated
Affected versions
- Splunk Splunk Enterprise
From 10.4 · fixed in 10.4.2; From 10.2 · fixed in 10.2.6; From 10.0 · fixed in 10.0.9; From 9.4 · fixed in 9.4.14
- Splunk Splunk Secure Gateway
From 3.10 · fixed in 3.10.9; From 3.9 · fixed in 3.9.23; From 3.8 · fixed in 3.8.70