CVE-2026-67345
MaxKey 4.1.12 DefaultRedirectResolver OAuth Authorization Code Theft
- Published
- Last modified
- Where the record stands: published, rejected by its publisher, or superseded by another id.What do these mean? →
- published
- Whether CISA lists it in its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog: proof that attackers are using it.What do these mean? →
- Not listed in CISA KEV
- Fix
- Fix or patch referenced
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
CISA's decision points: whether it is exploited, whether attacks can be automated, and how much control an attacker gets. Assessed (SSVC 2.0.3).What do these mean? →
- Exploitation: none
- Automatable: no
- Technical impact: total
Summary
MaxKey through 4.1.12, fixed in commit ddbb72f, contains an insufficient redirect URI validation vulnerability in DefaultRedirectResolver.hostMatches() that allows remote attackers to hijack OAuth 2.0 authorization codes by supplying a crafted redirect_uri whose hostname suffix matches a registered URI without proper dot-boundary anchoring. Attackers who control a domain ending with the registered redirect URI hostname can social-engineer victims into clicking a crafted authorization URL, causing the authorization code to be issued to the attacker-controlled URI and exchanged for an access token granting access to the victim's identity.
Timeline
- CVE published
- CISA SSVC assessment
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: total
- Record last updated
Affected versions
- dromara MaxKey
through 4.1.12