CVE-2026-61503
Rejetto HFS < 3.2.1 Username Enumeration via Login Response Differences
- Published
- Last modified
- Where the record stands: published, rejected by its publisher, or superseded by another id.What do these mean? →
- published
- Whether CISA lists it in its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog: proof that attackers are using it.What do these mean? →
- Not listed in CISA KEV
- Fix
- Fixed in 3.2.1
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
CISA's decision points: whether it is exploited, whether attacks can be automated, and how much control an attacker gets. Assessed (SSVC 2.0.3).What do these mean? →
- Exploitation: none
- Automatable: yes
- Technical impact: partial
Summary
Rejetto HFS 3.0.0 through 3.2.0 returns observably different responses from its login endpoint depending on whether the submitted username exists. A remote unauthenticated attacker can use this to confirm valid account names, including the default admin account, facilitating password-guessing and session-forgery attacks.
Timeline
- CVE published
- CISA SSVC assessment
Exploitation: none · Automatable: yes · Technical impact: partial
- Record last updated
Affected versions
- rejetto hfs
From 3.0.0 · fixed in 3.2.1