CVE-2026-59324
fluxTransform shared RequestMessageHolder causes cross-message header leakage under async fluxFunction
- Published
- Last modified
- Where the record stands: published, rejected by its publisher, or superseded by another id.What do these mean? →
- published
- Whether CISA lists it in its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog: proof that attackers are using it.What do these mean? →
- Not listed in CISA KEV
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
CISA's decision points: whether it is exploited, whether attacks can be automated, and how much control an attacker gets. Assessed (SSVC 2.0.3).What do these mean? →
- Exploitation: none
- Automatable: yes
- Technical impact: partial
Summary
When an IntegrationFlow uses .fluxTransform() with an asynchronous/reordering fluxFunction that emits raw payloads, concurrent requests on the same FluxMessageChannel subscription have their reply headers (replyChannel, errorChannel, correlationId, any propagated security/tenant headers) copied from whichever message was most recently consumed upstream. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12 Spring Integration 5.5.21 and earlier
Timeline
- CVE published
- CISA SSVC assessment
Exploitation: none · Automatable: yes · Technical impact: partial
- Record last updated
Affected versions
- Spring Spring Integration
From 7.0.0 · through 7.0.5; From 6.5.0 · through 6.5.10; From 6.4.0 · through 6.4.12; through 5.5.21