CVE-2026-58066
Rocket.Chat's SAML SSO before versions 8.7.0, 8.6.1, 8.5.2, 8.4.5, 8.3.7, 8.2.7, 8.1.7, 8.0.8, and 7.10.14 verified XML signatures but did n
- Published
- Last modified
- Where the record stands: published, rejected by its publisher, or superseded by another id.What do these mean? →
- published
- Whether CISA lists it in its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog: proof that attackers are using it.What do these mean? →
- Not listed in CISA KEV
- Fix
- Fixed in 8.7.0, 8.6.1, 8.5.2, 8.4.5, 8.3.7, and 4 more
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
CISA's decision points: whether it is exploited, whether attacks can be automated, and how much control an attacker gets. Assessed (SSVC 2.0.3).What do these mean? →
- Exploitation: none
- Automatable: yes
- Technical impact: total
Summary
Rocket.Chat's SAML SSO before versions 8.7.0, 8.6.1, 8.5.2, 8.4.5, 8.3.7, 8.2.7, 8.1.7, 8.0.8, and 7.10.14 verified XML signatures but did not bind the validated signature to samlp:Response / saml:Assertion. An attacker could submit a wrapped document carrying forged identity attributes alongside any valid signature made by the trusted IdP certificate, and log in as an arbitrary user.
Timeline
- CISA SSVC assessment
Exploitation: none · Automatable: yes · Technical impact: total
- CVE published
- Record last updated
Affected versions
- Rocket.Chat Rocket.Chat
fixed in 8.7.0; fixed in 8.6.1; fixed in 8.5.2; fixed in 8.4.5; fixed in 8.3.7; fixed in 8.2.7; fixed in 8.1.7; fixed in 8.0.8; fixed in 7.10.14