CVE-2026-4277PYSEC-2026-52BIT-DJANGO-2026-4277GHSA-PWJP-CCJC-GHWG
Privilege abuse in GenericInlineModelAdmin
- Published
- Last modified
- Where the record stands: published, rejected by its publisher, or superseded by another id.What do these mean? →
- published
- Whether CISA lists it in its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog: proof that attackers are using it.What do these mean? →
- Not listed in CISA KEV
- Fix
- Fixed in 6.0.4, 5.2.13, 4.2.30
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
CISA's decision points: whether it is exploited, whether attacks can be automated, and how much control an attacker gets. Assessed (SSVC 2.0.3).What do these mean? →
- Exploitation: none
- Automatable: yes
- Technical impact: total
Summary
An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.4, 5.2 before 5.2.13, and 4.2 before 4.2.30. Add permissions on inline model instances were not validated on submission of forged `POST` data in `GenericInlineModelAdmin`. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank N05ec@LZU-DSLab for reporting this issue.
Timeline
- CVE published
- CISA SSVC assessment
Exploitation: none · Automatable: yes · Technical impact: total
- Record last updated
Affected versions
- django
From 6.0 · fixed in 6.0.4; From 5.2 · fixed in 5.2.13; From 4.2 · fixed in 4.2.30
- djangoPyPI
From 4.2 · fixed in 4.2.30; From 5.2 · fixed in 5.2.13; From 6.0 · fixed in 6.0.4
- djangoPyPI
From 6.0 · fixed in 6.0.4
- djangoPyPI
From 5.2 · fixed in 5.2.13
- djangoPyPI
From 4.2 · fixed in 4.2.30