CVE-2026-40827
Authenticated SQLi in _RemoveRequest function
- Published
- Last modified
- Where the record stands: published, rejected by its publisher, or superseded by another id.What do these mean? →
- published
- Whether CISA lists it in its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog: proof that attackers are using it.What do these mean? →
- Not listed in CISA KEV
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
CISA's decision points: whether it is exploited, whether attacks can be automated, and how much control an attacker gets. Assessed (SSVC 2.0.3).What do these mean? →
- Exploitation: none
- Automatable: no
- Technical impact: partial
Summary
A high privileged remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the _RemoveRequest function due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL DELETE command allowing for reading the whole database and deleting entries in a non critical table. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality and some loss of integrity.
Timeline
- CVE published
- CISA SSVC assessment
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial
- Record last updated
Affected versions
- MB connect line mbCONNECT24
From 0.0.0 · through 2.20.0
- MB connect line mymbCONNECT24
From 0.0.0 · through 2.20.0
- MB connect line mbCONNECT24
2.20.0
- MB connect line mymbCONNECT24
2.20.0
- Helmholz myREX24V2
From 0.0.0 · through 2.20.0
- Helmholz myREX24V2.virtual
From 0.0.0 · through 2.20.0
- Helmholz myREX24V2
2.20.0
- Helmholz myREX24V2.virtual
2.20.0