Skip to main content
← All vulnerabilities
CVE-2026-15307PYSEC-2026-4035BIT-DJANGO-2026-15307GHSA-WVQV-FJ8W-QMHM

Server-side file-write and request forgery via spatial lookups

Published
Last modified
published
Not listed in CISA KEV
Fix
Fixed in 6.0.8, 5.2.17
None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
  • Exploitation: none
  • Automatable: no
  • Technical impact: total

Summary

An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8. GeoDjango spatial lookups optimistically parse the right-hand-side value as a raster by passing it to the `django.contrib.gis.gdal.GDALRaster` constructor. Any value used in a spatial lookup against a `GeometryField` or `RasterField` reaches this constructor, including untrusted input, for example a spatial-field filter submitted through the Django admin changelist query string by a staff user with view permission. A `dict`, or a `str` holding its JSON representation, is opened in write mode regardless of the constructor's `write=False` default, allowing a file with an attacker-chosen name and contents to be written through a file-backed GDAL driver. Any other `str` is treated as a datasource, allowing an outbound network request through a GDAL virtual filesystem handler. Writing a file to a location later imported by the application can result in remote code execution. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Bence Nagy, localhost-detect, and kimchunbok_ for reporting this issue.

Timeline

  1. CISA SSVC assessment

    Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: total

  2. CVE published
  3. Record last updated

Affected versions

  • django

    From 6.0 · fixed in 6.0.8; From 5.2 · fixed in 5.2.17

  • djangoPyPI

    fixed in 5.2.17; From 6.0a1 · fixed in 6.0.8

  • djangoPyPI

    fixed in 5.2.17

  • djangoPyPI

    From 6.0a1 · fixed in 6.0.8

References 7

docs.djangoproject.com

groups.google.com

GitHub · django/django

djangoproject.com