CVE-2025-69413GHSA-PC73-RJ2C-WVF9BIT-GITEA-2025-69413GO-2026-4274
In Gitea before 1.25.2, /api/v1/user has different responses for failed authentication depending on whether a username exists.
- Published
- Last modified
- Where the record stands: published, rejected by its publisher, or superseded by another id.What do these mean? →
- published
- Whether CISA lists it in its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog: proof that attackers are using it.What do these mean? →
- Not listed in CISA KEV
- Fix
- Fixed in 1.25.2
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
CISA's decision points: whether it is exploited, whether attacks can be automated, and how much control an attacker gets. Assessed (SSVC 2.0.3).What do these mean? →
- Exploitation: none
- Automatable: yes
- Technical impact: partial
Summary
In Gitea before 1.25.2, /api/v1/user has different responses for failed authentication depending on whether a username exists.
Timeline
- CVE published
- CISA SSVC assessment
Exploitation: none · Automatable: yes · Technical impact: partial
- Record last updated
Affected versions
- Gitea Gitea
fixed in 1.25.2
- code.gitea.io/giteaGo
fixed in 1.25.2