CVE-2025-68392EUVD-2025-211224GHSA-WJ65-7RFX-MRHJ
Incorrect authorization in Protectel
- Last modified
- Where the record stands: published, rejected by its publisher, or superseded by another id.What do these mean? →
- published
- Whether CISA lists it in its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog: proof that attackers are using it.What do these mean? →
- Not listed in CISA KEV
- Fix
- Fixed in 6.5.19, 6.4.67
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
CISA's decision points: whether it is exploited, whether attacks can be automated, and how much control an attacker gets. Assessed (SSVC 2.0.3).What do these mean? →
- Exploitation: none
- Automatable: no
- Technical impact: partial
Summary
The ARKETEAM Protectel modules PROTECTELMAJ and BDF are affected. A low-privileged user can perform some actions reserved for administrators by sending forged direct requests to a specific endpoint, which bypasses the intended access controls.
Summarized by anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5. Verify details against the original sources.
Read the original description
ARKETEAM Protectel modules PROTECTELMAJ and BDF allow low privileged users to use some of the functionalities reserved for admin users by forging direct requests to a specific endpoint. This issue has been fixed in: PROTECTELMAJ v6.5.19 and BDF v6.4.67
Timeline
- CVE published
- First seen by cve.now
- CISA SSVC assessment
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial
- Record last updated
Affected versions
- ARKETEAM PROTECTELMAJ
fixed in 6.5.19
- ARKETEAM BDF
fixed in 6.4.67