CVE-2025-46706
BIG-IP iRules vulnerability
- Published
- Last modified
- Where the record stands: published, rejected by its publisher, or superseded by another id.What do these mean? →
- published
- Whether CISA lists it in its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog: proof that attackers are using it.What do these mean? →
- Not listed in CISA KEV
- Fix
- Fixed in 17.1.2.2, 16.1.6, 1.7.14-EHF-2, 1.4.0-EHF-3
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
CISA's decision points: whether it is exploited, whether attacks can be automated, and how much control an attacker gets. Assessed (SSVC 2.0.3).What do these mean? →
- Exploitation: none
- Automatable: yes
- Technical impact: partial
Summary
When an iRule containing the HTTP::respond command is configured on a virtual server, undisclosed requests can cause an increase in memory resource utilization. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Timeline
- CVE published
- CISA SSVC assessment
Exploitation: none · Automatable: yes · Technical impact: partial
- Record last updated
Affected versions
- F5 BIG-IP
From 17.1.0 · fixed in 17.1.2.2; From 16.1.0 · fixed in 16.1.6
- F5 BIG-IP Next SPK
From 1.7.0 · fixed in 1.7.14-EHF-2
- F5 BIG-IP Next CNF
From 1.1.0 · fixed in 1.4.0-EHF-3