CVE-2024-27132PYSEC-2024-240BIT-MLFLOW-2024-27132GHSA-6749-M5CP-6CG7
Insufficient sanitization in MLflow leads to XSS when running an untrusted recipe.
- Published
- Last modified
- Where the record stands: published, rejected by its publisher, or superseded by another id.What do these mean? →
- published
- Whether CISA lists it in its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog: proof that attackers are using it.What do these mean? →
- Not listed in CISA KEV
- Fix
- Fixed in 2.10.0
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
CISA's decision points: whether it is exploited, whether attacks can be automated, and how much control an attacker gets. Assessed (SSVC 2.0.3).What do these mean? →
- Exploitation: poc
- Automatable: no
- Technical impact: total
Summary
Insufficient sanitization in MLflow leads to XSS when running an untrusted recipe. This issue leads to a client-side RCE when running an untrusted recipe in Jupyter Notebook. The vulnerability stems from lack of sanitization over template variables.
Timeline
- CVE published
- CISA SSVC assessment
Exploitation: poc · Automatable: no · Technical impact: total
- Record last updated
Affected versions
- mlflow
through 2.9.2
- mlflowPyPI
fixed in 2.10.0