Cisco Integrated Management Controller Redfish Command Injection Vulnerability
- Published
- Last modified
- Where the record stands: published, rejected by its publisher, or superseded by another id.What do these mean? →
- published
- Whether CISA lists it in its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog: proof that attackers are using it.What do these mean? →
- Not listed in CISA KEV
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
- Exploitation: none
- Automatable: no
- Technical impact: total
Summary
A vulnerability in the Redfish API of Cisco UCS B-Series, Cisco UCS Managed C-Series, and Cisco UCS X-Series Servers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with administrative privileges to perform command injection attacks on an affected system and elevate privileges to root. This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation. An attacker with administrative privileges could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted commands through the Redfish API on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to elevate privileges to root.
Timeline
- CVE published
- CISA SSVC assessment
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: total
- Record last updated
Affected versions
- Cisco Cisco Unified Computing System (Managed)
4.1(2a), 4.1(2b), 4.1(3a), 4.1(3b), 4.1(2c), 4.1(4a), 4.1(3c), 4.1(3d), 4.2(1c), 4.2(1d), 4.1(3e), 4.2(1f), 4.1(3f), 4.2(1i), 4.2(1k), 4.1(3h), 4.2(1l), 4.2(1m), 4.1(3i), 4.2(2a), 4.2(1n), 4.1(3j), 4.2(2c), 4.2(2d), 4.2(3b), 4.1(3k), 4.2(2e), 4.2(3d), 4.2(3e), 4.2(3g), and 13 more