erofs: fix buffer copy overflow of ztailpacking feature
- Published
- Last modified
- Where the record stands: published, rejected by its publisher, or superseded by another id.What do these mean? →
- published
- Whether CISA lists it in its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog: proof that attackers are using it.What do these mean? →
- Not listed in CISA KEV
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
- Exploitation: none
- Automatable: no
- Technical impact: total
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: erofs: fix buffer copy overflow of ztailpacking feature I got some KASAN report as below: [ 46.959738] ================================================================== [ 46.960430] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in z_erofs_shifted_transform+0x2bd/0x370 [ 46.960430] Read of size 4074 at addr ffff8880300c2f8e by task fssum/188 ... [ 46.960430] Call Trace: [ 46.960430] <TASK> [ 46.960430] dump_stack_lvl+0x41/0x5e [ 46.960430] print_report.cold+0xb2/0x6b7 [ 46.960430] ? z_erofs_shifted_transform+0x2bd/0x370 [ 46.960430] kasan_report+0x8a/0x140 [ 46.960430] ? z_erofs_shifted_transform+0x2bd/0x370 [ 46.960430] kasan_check_range+0x14d/0x1d0 [ 46.960430] memcpy+0x20/0x60 [ 46.960430] z_erofs_shifted_transform+0x2bd/0x370 [ 46.960430] z_erofs_decompress_pcluster+0xaae/0x1080 The root cause is that the tail pcluster won't be a complete filesystem block anymore. So if ztailpacking is used, the second part of an uncompressed tail pcluster may not be ``rq->pageofs_out``.
Timeline
- CVE published
- CISA SSVC assessment
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: total
- Record last updated
Affected versions
- Linux Linux
Version range not reported
- Linux Linux
5.17