Update
- Published
- Last modified
- Where the record stands: published, rejected by its publisher, or superseded by another id.What do these mean? →
- published
- Whether CISA lists it in its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog: proof that attackers are using it.What do these mean? →
- Not listed in CISA KEV
- Fix
- Fixed in V4.0, V1.30, V1.90, V3.00, V1.80, and 2 more
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
- Exploitation: none
- Automatable: no
- Technical impact: partial
Summary
Passwords are not adequately encrypted during the communication process between all versions of LS Industrial Systems (LSIS) Co. Ltd LS Electric XG5000 software prior to V4.0 and LS Electric PLCs: all versions of XGK-CPUU/H/A/S/E prior to V3.50, all versions of XGI-CPUU/UD/H/S/E prior to V3.20, all versions of XGR-CPUH prior to V1.80, all versions of XGB-XBMS prior to V3.00, all versions of XGB-XBCH prior to V1.90, and all versions of XGB-XECH prior to V1.30. This would allow an attacker to identify and decrypt the password of the affected PLCs by sniffing the PLC’s communication traffic.
Timeline
- CVE published
- CISA SSVC assessment
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial
- Record last updated
Affected versions
- LS Industrial Systems (LSIS) Co. Ltd LS Electric XG5000
fixed in V4.0
- LS Industrial Systems (LSIS) Co. Ltd LS Electric PLC: XGB-XECH
fixed in V1.30
- LS Industrial Systems (LSIS) Co. Ltd LS Electric PLC: XGB-XBCH
fixed in V1.90
- LS Industrial Systems (LSIS) Co. Ltd LS Electric PLC: XGB-XBMS
fixed in V3.00
- LS Industrial Systems (LSIS) Co. Ltd LS Electric PLC: XGR-CPUH
fixed in V1.80
- LS Industrial Systems (LSIS) Co. Ltd LS Electric PLC: XGI-CPUU/UD/H/S/E
fixed in V3.20
- LS Industrial Systems (LSIS) Co. Ltd LS Electric PLC: XGK-CPUU/H/A/S/E
fixed in V3.50