CVE-2021-4396
Rucy <= 0.4.4 - Cross-Site Request Forgery Bypass
- Published
- Last modified
- Where the record stands: published, rejected by its publisher, or superseded by another id.What do these mean? →
- published
- Whether CISA lists it in its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog: proof that attackers are using it.What do these mean? →
- Not listed in CISA KEV
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- None on Exploit-DB, Metasploit or GitHub
CISA's decision points: whether it is exploited, whether attacks can be automated, and how much control an attacker gets. Assessed (SSVC 2.0.3).What do these mean? →
- Exploitation: none
- Automatable: no
- Technical impact: partial
Summary
The Rucy plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 0.4.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save_rc_post_meta() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save post meta via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Timeline
- CVE published
- CISA SSVC assessment
Exploitation: none · Automatable: no · Technical impact: partial
- Record last updated
Affected versions
- gips-nita Rucy
through 0.4.4
References 9
blog.nintechnet.com
- 25-wordpress-plugins-vulnerable-to-csrf-attacks
- more-wordpress-plugins-and-themes-vulnerable-to-csrf-attacks
- multiple-wordpress-plugins-fixed-csrf-vulnerabilities-part-3
- multiple-wordpress-plugins-fixed-csrf-vulnerabilities-part-2
- multiple-wordpress-plugins-fixed-csrf-vulnerabilities-part-1
- multiple-wordpress-plugins-fixed-csrf-vulnerabilities-part-5
- multiple-wordpress-plugins-fixed-csrf-vulnerabilities-part-4