CVE-2011-1473
OpenSSL before 0.9.8l, and 0.9.8m through 1.x, does not properly restrict client-initiated renegotiation within the SSL and TLS protocols, w
- Published
- Last modified
- Where the record stands: published, rejected by its publisher, or superseded by another id.What do these mean? →
- published
- Whether CISA lists it in its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog: proof that attackers are using it.What do these mean? →
- Not listed in CISA KEV
- Whether working attack code is public (Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei or GitHub). Public code makes attacks easier.What do these mean? →
- 3 proofs of concept on GitHub
Summary
OpenSSL before 0.9.8l, and 0.9.8m through 1.x, does not properly restrict client-initiated renegotiation within the SSL and TLS protocols, which might make it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by performing many renegotiations within a single connection, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-5094. NOTE: it can also be argued that it is the responsibility of server deployments, not a security library, to prevent or limit renegotiation when it is inappropriate within a specific environment
Timeline
- CVE published
- Record last updated
- EPSS reached 10%
FIRST estimates at least a 10% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days
Affected versions
- n/a n/a
Version range not reported
References 27
vincent.bernat.im
ietf.org
bugzilla.redhat.com
archives.neohapsis.com
educatedguesswork.org
openwall.com
orchilles.com
lists.apache.org
- thread.html/142b93d261e8ac7c5ceffdce848d622404abc1c286bbc999f43a9e10@<dev.rocketmq.apache.org>
- thread.html/6121becfdd23f9aeb675d5db80616536277d5931d6cde9dca292e509@<dev.rocketmq.apache.org>
- thread.html/8be38d35654441140db8eb3f7433524b3653ac3fdc26e2fa94626a3a@<dev.rocketmq.apache.org>
- thread.html/r1e33410bb5c81536e7fe14b51fa83e7bfd9445db61fd10c134792bde@<dev.rocketmq.apache.org>
- thread.html/r298a09a2b98446b27217d719e877c643b6d13fac0bcafe04696a446b@<dev.rocketmq.apache.org>
- thread.html/r77fe575893261889b983e067293be72fa1f8c6305ede9fdbc404c514@<dev.rocketmq.apache.org>
- thread.html/r5e595b91f00613dafa635852121d45b161e8b5c3eba4551aeccc6483@<dev.rocketmq.apache.org>
- thread.html/r3822ad69442291562c2ab41132fc49780d269e8b52deb458b7060f6d@<commits.rocketmq.apache.org>
- thread.html/r8680f41bcdad13c3f267cb868b45e5fb1f57df8b39d25193f7d66500@<dev.rocketmq.apache.org>
- thread.html/ra95c355827b3c96c8013ed8e0666c851581651be2524f3d28cd4fe71@<dev.rocketmq.apache.org>
- thread.html/r13a07a09f98b2841193dbf17a47c7f09b464e0747a1d3e7298ad4c81@<dev.rocketmq.apache.org>
- thread.html/rf9e8ae0356af3ec4f7780ca651b770721d287d4d55f62f4f754e0a6f@<dev.rocketmq.apache.org>